Skip to content

Lamivudine and Adefovir to Treat Chronic Hepatitis B

Combination of Lamivudine and Adefovir Dipivoxil for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00023309
Enrollment
41
Registered
2001-09-03
Start date
2001-08-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2016-09-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HBV (Hepatitis B Virus), Hepatitis, Hepatitis B

Keywords

Adefovir Dipivoxil, Lamivudine, Nucleoside/Nucleotide Analogue, Chronic Hepatitis B, Hepatitis B Mutants, Liver Biopsy, Hepatitis B, Hepatitis, HBV, Liver

Brief summary

This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lamivudine plus adefovir versus adefovir alone to treat chronic hepatitis B infection. The Food and Drug Administration has approved lamivudine for the treatment of hepatitis B. However, the drug is not effective in all patients, and many of those in whom it initially works develop resistance after 1 to 3 years. Adefovir is an experimental drug that inhibits replication of the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Adefovir used alone may be adequate to provide sustained suppression of the virus and improvement in liver disease. However combining two anti-viral agents may be superior to using one alone, similar to the strategy employed for the treatment of AIDS. This study will test whether the combination of lamivudine and adefovir is better than adefovir alone for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Patients 18 years of age and older, who have been infected with HBV for at least 6 months, may be eligible for this study. Candidates may not have received lamivudine treatment in the past 6 months or prior treatment with adefovir and must not be taking other anti-viral treatments for their hepatitis. They will have a blood test to confirm HBV infection. Participants will be admitted to the NIH Clinical Center for 2 to 3 days for a medical evaluation. One to 2 weeks after the evaluation, patients will be randomized to begin taking lamivudine and adefovir, or adefovir alone. Therapy will continue for at least 12 months. Follow-up clinic visits will be scheduled weekly for the first month, then every 4 to 8 weeks for the rest of the treatment period. Patients will be evaluated at the end of 1 year. Patients who have not improved with treatment will stop taking the treatment and will be evaluated in the clinic once every 4 weeks for another 6 months. Patients who show an improvement in their liver injury may continue taking lamivudine and adefovir or adefovir alone for 4 more years, as long as they continue to improve with the medication. Progress will be evaluated. If the test results show no continued improvement or are negative for hepatitis B antigens, therapy will be stopped. Patients who continue treatment for 5 years will be readmitted at year 4 for another medical evaluation to assess the effects of treatment at that time. After the 5 years all patients will stop therapy at and be followed with regular clinic visits for at least 6 months.

Detailed description

Aims: To assess the safety, antiviral activity and clinical benefit of the combination of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil vs adefovir alone in up to 80 patients with chronic hepatitis B for up to five years. Background: Adefovir dipivoxil and lamivudine are oral antiviral agents that have been shown to have potent activity against HBV in vitro and in vivo. Both drugs have been used extensively in patients with HIV infection and more recently in controlled trials as monotherapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Lamivudine is currently approved as therapy of hepatitis B and has been evaluated extensively both as a one-year course of treatment as well as long-term continuous therapy. While lamivudine monotherapy induces a transient improvement in viral levels and liver histology, viral resistance develops in a large proportion of patients with re-appearance of HBV DNA in serum in high levels associated with mutations in the Tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD) motif of the HBV polymerase gene and worsening of the hepatitis. Adefovir monotherapy, in contrast, has not been shown to be associated with development of viral resistance even when given for up to two years. When given as monotherapy for 1 year, adefovir leads to improvement in histology of hepatitis B in approximately 50% of patients. At present, the long-term efficacy of adefovir has not been shown. Protocol: Up to 80 patients with chronic hepatitis B who have raised serum ALT (alanine aminotransferase) levels, HBV DNA in serum (above 1 million copies per ml by quantitative PCR) and active liver disease on liver biopsy will be enrolled and started on the combination of lamivudine (100 mg daily) and adefovir dipivoxil (10 mg daily) or adefovir alone (10 mg daily). Patients will be stratified into one of four groups of 20 patients for randomization: (A) Lamivudine naive and HBeAg positive, (B) Lamivudine naive and HBeAg negative (C) previous lamivudine therapy and HBeAg positive and (D) previous lamivudine therapy and HBeAg negative. Patients will be monitored carefully during therapy for adverse events, clinical symptoms and signs of liver disease, biochemical, and hematological parameters, and HBV serology at 2 to 4 week intervals. The primary endpoint of therapy will be a maintained combined response (a combination of virological, biochemical, and histological response) with major timing of end-points being at 1 and 4 years. Secondary endpoints will include loss of HBeAg, the individual types of maintained responses (virological, biochemical and histological), the development of lamivudine resistance, and improvement in symptom scores and quality of life assessments at 1 and 4 years. Conclusions: This study will assess the effects of the combination of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil compared to adefovir alone in suppressing hepatitis B and prevention of lamivudine resistant mutants that arise during long-term therapy with lamivudine alone.

Interventions

DRUGLamivudine and adefovir

Lamivudine (100 mg/day) and adefovir (10 mg/day)

DRUGAdefovir alone

Adefovir (10 mg/day)

Sponsors

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: Age greater than 18 years and above, male or female Known serum HBsAg positivity for at least 6 months Detectable HBV-DNA in serum above 1 million copies per ml, as detected by quantitative PCR (Roche Cobas Assay) Serum ALT (alanine aminotransferase) or AST (aspartate aminotransferase)levels above the upper limit of normal based on two determinations taken at least one month apart during the 6 months before entry Liver biopsy within 2 years consistent with chronic hepatitis and with a histology activity index score (HAI) of 6 or more (out of a total possible score of 22) and an Ishak fibrosis score of at least 1 (out of a total possible score of 6). For patients with lamivudine resistance the liver biopsy may be performed either on or off lamivudine. Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Previous or current treatment with adefovir or tenofovir. Co-infection with HDV (Hepatitis D Virus) as defined by the presence of both anti-HDV in serum and HDV antigen in liver Co-infection with HCV (Hepatitis C Virus) as defined by the presence of both anti-HCV and HCV RNA in serum. Co-infection with HIV (Human immunodeficiency virus) as defined by the presence of anti-HIV in serum. Decompensated liver disease as defined by serum bilirubin greater than 2.5 mg%, prothrombin time of greater than 2 seconds prolonged, a serum albumin of less than 3.0 gm%, or a history of ascites, variceal bleeding, or hepatic encephalopathy. Presence of other causes of liver disease (i.e., hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, alcoholic liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency) A history of organ transplantation or in the absence of organ transplantation, any immunosuppressive therapy requiring the use of more than 5 mg of prednisone (or its equivalent) daily. Significant systemic illnesses other than liver diseases including congestive heart failure, renal failure, chronic pancreatitis, diabetes mellitus with poor control that in the opinion of the investigators might interfere with therapy. Pregnancy or inability to practice contraception in patients capable of bearing or fathering children Pre-existing bone marrow suppression: White Blood Cells (WBC) less than 2,000 cells/mm(3), hematocrit less than 30%, or platelets less than 50,000 cells/mm(3). History of clinically apparent pancreatitis or evidence of subclinical pancreatitis as shown by serum amylase values twice the upper limits of the normal range and abnormalities of the pancreas on CT or other imaging studies of the abdomen Prior interferon treatment within 6 months of entry Sensory or motor neuropathy apparent from medical history and physical examination Creatinine clearance less than 50 ml/min or serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dl; creatinine clearance will be determined on a 24 hour urine specimen. Accuracy of collection will be ensured by documenting appropriate total creatinine excretion in the 24 hour urine specimen (15 mg/kg) and correcting for the patient's age and gender. Concurrent use of nephrotoxic agents (e.g., aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, vancomycin, foscarnet, cis-platinum, pentamidine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents) or competitors of renal tubular excretion (e.g., probenecid) within 2 months prior to study screening or the expectation that the subject will receive these during the course of the study History of hypersensitivity to nucleoside/nucleotide analogues Active ethanol/drug abuse/psychiatric problems that, in the investigator's opinion, might interfere with participation in the study History of seizure disorder History of renal tubular acidosis History of malignancy or treatment for a malignancy within the past 5 years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maintained Combined Response (Virological, Biochemical and Histological Response).196 weeks from randomizationA maintained combined response was defined as a combination of a virological, biochemical and histological responses at weeks 48 and 192. A virological response was defined as a decrease in HBV DNA levels to undetectable by the Amplicor assay (\<500 copies/mL). A biochemical response was defined as a decrease in serum ALT levels into the normal range (\<41 U/L). A histological response was defined as a decrease in the HAI score by at least three points with no worsening of the Ishak fibrosis score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HBeAg Loss at Week 196Week 196 from randomizationLoss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at week 196
Virological ResponseWeek 196 from randomizationA virological response was defined as a decrease in HBV DNA levels to undetectable by the Amplicor assay (\<500 copies/mL).
Biological Responseweek 196 from randomizationA biochemical response was defined as a decrease in serum ALT levels into the normal range (\<41 U/L).
Histological Responseweek 196 from randomizationA histological response was defined as a decrease in the HAI score by at least three points with no worsening of the Ishak fibrosis score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Forty-one patients were enrolled, twenty-two were randomized to receive the combination lamivudine and adefovir and nineteen to receive adefovir alone.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lamivudine and Adefovir
Patients to receive combination lamivudine and adefovir
22
Adefovir
Patients to receive adefovir alone
19
Total41

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalAdefovirLamivudine and Adefovir
Age, Continuous45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
45 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
ALT139 IU/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 187
87 IU/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56
183 IU/ml
STANDARD_DEVIATION 250
Cirrhosis
No
34 participants17 participants17 participants
Cirrhosis
Yes
7 participants2 participants5 participants
HAI8.0 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6
7.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.4
8.1 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7
HBeAg positive
No
10 participants5 participants5 participants
HBeAg positive
Yes
31 participants14 participants17 participants
HBV DNA Log 10 copies per ml8.0 log10(copies/ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4
7.8 log10(copies/ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
8.1 log10(copies/ml)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3
Ishak2.9 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6
2.4 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5
3.3 Units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
19 participants10 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
5 participants1 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
17 participants8 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
41 participants19 participants22 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants1 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
34 Participants18 Participants16 Participants
Treatment Naive
No
10 participants5 participants5 participants
Treatment Naive
Yes
31 participants14 participants17 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Maintained Combined Response (Virological, Biochemical and Histological Response).

A maintained combined response was defined as a combination of a virological, biochemical and histological responses at weeks 48 and 192. A virological response was defined as a decrease in HBV DNA levels to undetectable by the Amplicor assay (\<500 copies/mL). A biochemical response was defined as a decrease in serum ALT levels into the normal range (\<41 U/L). A histological response was defined as a decrease in the HAI score by at least three points with no worsening of the Ishak fibrosis score.

Time frame: 196 weeks from randomization

Population: The analysis was intention to treat. Patients with missing values at week 196 were treated as random missing. No imputation was applied.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lamivudine and AdefovirMaintained Combined Response (Virological, Biochemical and Histological Response).Yes15 participants
Lamivudine and AdefovirMaintained Combined Response (Virological, Biochemical and Histological Response).No7 participants
AdefovirMaintained Combined Response (Virological, Biochemical and Histological Response).Yes6 participants
AdefovirMaintained Combined Response (Virological, Biochemical and Histological Response).No13 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there is no difference in the treatment effect between the two groupsp-value: 0.0294Fisher Exact
Secondary

Biological Response

A biochemical response was defined as a decrease in serum ALT levels into the normal range (\<41 U/L).

Time frame: week 196 from randomization

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lamivudine and AdefovirBiological ResponseNo1 participants
Lamivudine and AdefovirBiological ResponseYes21 participants
AdefovirBiological ResponseYes12 participants
AdefovirBiological ResponseNo7 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there is no difference in treatment effect at week 196p-value: 0.0157Fisher Exact
Secondary

HBeAg Loss at Week 196

Loss of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) at week 196

Time frame: Week 196 from randomization

Population: Analysis was intention to treat. Patients with missing values at timeframe of interest was taken as random missing. No imputation was applied.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lamivudine and AdefovirHBeAg Loss at Week 196Yes13 participants
Lamivudine and AdefovirHBeAg Loss at Week 196No4 participants
AdefovirHBeAg Loss at Week 196Yes5 participants
AdefovirHBeAg Loss at Week 196No9 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there is no difference in treatment effect at week 196p-value: 0.0325Fisher Exact
Secondary

Histological Response

A histological response was defined as a decrease in the HAI score by at least three points with no worsening of the Ishak fibrosis score.

Time frame: week 196 from randomization

Population: Analysis was intention to treat. Patients with missing values at timeframe of interest was taken as random missing. No imputation was applied.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lamivudine and AdefovirHistological ResponseYes15 participants
Lamivudine and AdefovirHistological ResponseNo3 participants
AdefovirHistological ResponseYes5 participants
AdefovirHistological ResponseNo5 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there is no difference in treatment effect at week 196p-value: 0.0913Fisher Exact
Secondary

Virological Response

A virological response was defined as a decrease in HBV DNA levels to undetectable by the Amplicor assay (\<500 copies/mL).

Time frame: Week 196 from randomization

Population: Intention to treat

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Lamivudine and AdefovirVirological ResponseYes17 participants
Lamivudine and AdefovirVirological ResponseNo5 participants
AdefovirVirological ResponseYes6 participants
AdefovirVirological ResponseNo13 participants
Comparison: Null hypothesis: there is no difference in treatment effect at week 196p-value: 0.0049Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026