Skip to content

Assessing Quality of Life of Patients With Stomach Cancer

An International Field Study Of The Reliability And Validity Of The EORTC QLQ-C30 And A Disease-Specific Questionnaire Module (The QLQ-STO22) In Assessing The Quality Of Life Of Patients With Gastric Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00020826
Enrollment
267
Registered
2003-01-27
Start date
2001-04-30
Completion date
2004-01-31
Last updated
2012-08-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastric Cancer

Keywords

adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Assessing quality of life in patients who are undergoing cancer treatment may help determine the effect of treatment on these patients. PURPOSE: Clinical trial to study the effectiveness of a quality of life assessment in patients who are receiving treatment for stomach cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * Determine the scale structure, reliability, and validity of the tumor-specific questionnaire, QLQ-STO22, in assessing the quality of life of patients with gastric cancer. * Determine the questionnaire's sensitivity to change in clinical health status in these patients. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to type of treatment (potentially curative vs potentially palliative), disease stage (local and locoregional vs metastatic), Karnofsky performance status (less than 80% vs more than 80%), and initial weight gain (none vs less than 10% of total body weight vs 10% or more of total body weight). * Curatively Treated Group: Quality of life is assessed at 4 weeks prior to surgery and 3 months after surgery in patients receiving total or partial gastrectomy with curative intent; at 4 weeks prior to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, 4 weeks prior to surgery, and 3 months after surgery in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by total or partial gastrectomy with curative intent; at 4 weeks prior to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy and 6 weeks after completion of therapy in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy following total or partial gastrectomy; and at 4 weeks prior to therapy and 3 months after completion of therapy in patients receiving endoscopic mucosal resection or laparoscopic wedge resection. * Palliatively Treated Group: Quality of life is assessed at 3 weeks prior to palliative therapy and 4 weeks after beginning palliative therapy. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: Approximately 220 patients (110 per group) will be accrued for this study within 2 years.

Interventions

OTHERquality-of-life assessment

QLQ-C30 questionnaire administered. STO22 questionnaire administered.

Sponsors

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma * Patients treated with curative intent according to one of the following criteria: * Plan to undergo total or partial gastrectomy with curative intent * Plan to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy followed by total or partial gastrectomy with curative intent * Prior total or partial gastrectomy with curative intent and currently receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy * Prior endoscopic mucosal resection or laparoscopic wedge resection of early gastric cancer OR * Patients with initial diagnosis of gastric cancer or recurrent disease with plans to receive one of the following therapies with palliative intent: * Total or partial gastrectomy or bypass procedure * Endoscopic procedure (e.g., stent insertion) * Chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy * Supportive measures only * No concurrent enrollment on other quality of life study that would interfere with this study * Not previously enrolled on this study PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: * Any age Performance status: * Any performance status Life expectancy: * At least 2 months for patients treated with curative intent * At least 4 weeks for patients treated with palliative intent Hematopoietic: * Not specified Hepatic: * Not specified Renal: * Not specified Other: * No other concurrent malignancies except basal cell carcinoma of the skin * No mental impairment that would preclude completion of questionnaire * No psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition that would preclude study compliance PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: * Not specified Chemotherapy: * See Disease Characteristics Endocrine therapy: * Not specified Radiotherapy: * See Disease Characteristics Surgery: * See Disease Characteristics

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
psychometric validity of the STO22 moduleThe EORTC QLQ-C30 and the gastric cancer module (QLQ-STO22) will be prospectively administered once before and once after primary treatment.Quality of life scores will be evaluated for psychometric validity by: * Scale structure using multi-trait scaling analysis * Reliability using tests of internal consistency * Test-retest reliability in patients recruited in the UK * Validity using inter-scale correlations and known group comparisons * Sensitivity to change using two measurements of Quality of Life and ANOVA to look for the significance of changes in quality of life scores as a function of observed changes in clinical status over time.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
debriefing questionnaire informationat baselinePatients will be asked to complete a short debriefing questionnaire covering questions about the time taken to complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22; the need for help in completing the questionnaires and querying whether any of the questionnaire items were confusing; difficult to answer or upsetting.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
complianceat the same timepoints when the QoL questionnaires are completedProportion of completed versus expected QoL questionnaires
correlation between QLQ-C30 and STO22 scoresbefore and after treatmentcorrelations between the different established scales of the QLQ-C30 and the hypothesized STO22 scales will be calculated.

Countries

France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026