Skip to content

Occupation and Asthma in an Urban Low Income Population

Occupation and Asthma in an Urban Low Income Population

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00014820
Enrollment
800
Registered
2001-04-12
Start date
2001-03-31
Completion date
2005-02-28
Last updated
2015-12-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma, Lung Diseases

Brief summary

To study work-related asthma in a low-income, urban population.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Work-related asthma is asthma that is attributable to, or is made worse by, environmental exposures in the workplace. Published estimates of the proportion of adult asthma attributable to occupational factors have varied widely, depending on population, methodology, and definitions, from 2 percent to 33 percent. Occupational asthma is of great public health importance because it is potentially preventable, can cause substantial disability, and in some cases is completely curable. Among adults in the United States, asthma has become a major public health problem, with rates most elevated among low income, urban, African American and Latino sectors of the population, and with substantial evidence suggesting potential occupational contributions to the excess rates. These important sectors of the U.S. population have, however, been inadequately represented in the occupational asthma research literature. DESIGN NARRATIVE: This was a case control study of physician-diagnosed asthma, occupation, industry, and workplace environmental exposures designed to evaluate the hypothesis that a substantial component of the asthma burden in a low income, urban, largely minority population was due to occupational factors. The study design addressed a variety of methodologic challenges including healthy worker effects, difficulty contacting and recruiting this potentially high risk population, large numbers of potential etiologic agents, mixed exposures, small workplaces, and low absolute incidence of occupational asthma. The study population was the catchment population of Bellevue Hospital, a general hospital in lower Manhattan, New York City, with busy ambulatory care services that serve low income working communities. Cases and controls were recruited from among outpatients and inpatients at Bellevue Hospital and interviewed face-to-face or by telephone. Occupation, industry, and occupational exposures were determined by questionnaire supplemented by a Job Exposure Matrix. Odds ratios (ORs) of association between asthma and specific industrial, occupational, and exposure categories, controlled for major confounders, were estimated. The ORs were used to calculate occupation- and industry-specific Attributable Fractions, and an overall Population Attributable Fraction of asthma attributable to occupational factors. New onset occupational asthma and work-aggravated asthma were investigated separately.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
NYU Langone Health
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject unwilling to be interviewed or does not give informed consent 2. For nonsmokers, age under 18 or over 65. For smokers, age under 18 or over 45 3. For cases, asthma diagnosis (at Bellevue or elsewhere) prior to beginning of study period. For controls, asthma diagnosis ever. 4. Unemployed at case onset age 5. Fee-coded as Medicaid for all visits during study period 6. Fluency in either English or Spanish inadequate to communicate clearly with interviewer, or need for interpreter in language other than Spanish noted in chart 7. Medical records not HIV disease, STD, addiction-related diagnosis, or other sensitive diagnosis (to avoid problems of confidentiality) 8. Clear understanding of what is being asked is lacking, in judgement of interviewer 9. Responses to initial interview questions appear grossly unreliable, in the judgement of the interviewer 10. Prisoners

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026