Skip to content

EPOCH and Rituximab to Treat Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma in Patients With HIV Infection

Short-Course EPOCH - Rituximab in Untreated CD-20+ HIV-Associated Lymphomas

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00006436
Enrollment
68
Registered
2000-11-06
Start date
2001-01-29
Completion date
2024-01-18
Last updated
2025-12-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, AIDS-related, Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse

Keywords

AIDS, Malignancy, Antiretroviral, Chemotherapy, Monoclonal

Brief summary

Background: * Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients have a weakened immune system, and chemotherapy, which is used to treat lymphoma, probably causes further damage to the immune system. * Limiting the amount of immune damage due to chemotherapy might decrease the number of infections and the risk of developing cancer in the future in HIV-infected patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Objectives: * To determine whether reducing the total amount of chemotherapy using a specific combination of drugs called EPOCH-R (etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab) will rid the body of lymphoma quickly while decreasing the risk of infections and future cancers. * To determine whether the lymphoma will remain undetectable for at least one year if treatment is stopped one cycle after the patient enters remission. Eligibility: -Patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and HIV infection 4 years of age and older who have not been treated previously with rituximab or cytotoxic chemotherapy. Design: * Patients receive EPOCH-R in 3-week treatment cycles for at least three and no more than six cycles. * The lymphoma is evaluated using computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans at the end of treatment cycles 2 and 3. A bone marrow biopsy is repeated after cycle 2 if a biopsy was initially positive on screening for participation in the study. * Anti-HIV therapy is stopped before chemotherapy begins and is restarted when EPOCH-R treatment ends. * Patients are monitored for treatment response with blood tests and imaging scans at baseline, when treatment ends, 2 months after treatment ends and then every 3 to 6 months for a total of 24 months following chemotherapy.

Detailed description

Background: This is a study to investigate in a preliminary fashion the feasibility of short course chemotherapy to participants with HIV-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (HIV-NHL). This study will investigate if the paradigm for treatment can be successfully changed from a standard of 6 cycles to one cycle beyond complete remission with 6 total allowable cycles. Objective: To assess with 90 percent probability that at least 50 percent of participants treated with short-course EPOCH-R (etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab) will be progression free at one year. Eligibility: Aggressive B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 (CD20) positive Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). HIV+ serology. All stages (I-IV) of disease. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status 0-4. Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Age greater than or equal to 18 years. May not be pregnant or nursing. May not have received previous rituximab. Design: Participants will be treated every three weeks with a combination of EPOCH and rituximab for one cycle beyond complete remission (CR)/complete response unconfirmed (CRu) by computed tomography (CT) scan of all detectable tumors for a minimum of three and maximum of six cycles. Following cycle 2, CT, positron emission tomography scans (PET), and bone marrow biopsies (if initially positive) will be performed. At the conclusion of the study, we will estimate whether the number of cycles can be reduced using the paradigm. If the cumulative number of participants to relapse exceeds 25 percent by 6 months, the study will be closed. Following the completion of chemotherapy, restaging will be performed 2 months following the end of treatment, then every 3 months for one year, every 6 months for one year, then every 12 months until relapse, death, or loss to follow up. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) will be given concurrently with treatment regimen. To study the effects of treatment approach on parameters of HIV disease, measurements of cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) cells and viral loads will be made at baseline and at the completion of therapy, and then 2 months following the end of treatment, and then every 3-6 months for a total of 24 months following chemotherapy.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALRituximab

2 doses of rituximab every cycle: first dose on Day 1 and 2nd dose on Day 5

BIOLOGICALFilgrastim

Filgrastim day 6 until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reaches 5000 after the nadir, every cycle

DRUGEPOCH

combination chemotheray: EPOCH every 3 weeks for minimum of 3 cycles and max of 6 cycles

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* INCLUSION CRITERIA: Aggressive B-lymphocyte antigen CD20 (CD20) positive Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma confirmed by Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute (NCI). Note: Participants with aggressive B-cell lymphoma of the plasmablastic lymphoma sub-type who do not have surface CD20 expression, are also eligible. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) + serology. All stages (I-IV) of disease. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status 0-4 Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) previously untreated with cytotoxic chemotherapy; however, participants may be entered if they have had prior cyclophosphamide for an urgent problem at diagnosis (e.g., epidural cord compression, superior vena cava syndrome) and/or a single dose of intrathecal methotrexate (MTX) at the time of the pre-treatment diagnostic lumbar puncture Age greater than or equal to 18 years Laboratory tests (unless impairment due to respective organ involvement by tumor): * Creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 mg/dl or creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 50 ml/min * Bilirubin less than 2.0 mg/dl, or total bilirubin less than or equal to 4.5 mg/dl with direct fraction less than or equal to 0.3 mg/dl in participants for whom these abnormalities are felt to be due to protease inhibitor therapy * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) less than or equal to 3x upper limit of normal (ULN) (AST and ALT less than or equal to 6x ULN for participants on hyperalimentation for whom these abnormalities are felt to be due to the hyperalimentation) * Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1000/mm(3) * Platelet greater than or equal to 75,000/mm(3) (unless impairment due to Immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) Ability of participant to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Previous rituximab Pregnancy or nursing. \- Doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine and cyclophosphamide are teratogenic and may be excreted in milk. Current clinical heart failure or symptomatic ischemic heart disease. Serious underlying medical condition or infection other than HIV that would contraindicate subcutaneous (SC)-rituximab, etoposide phosphate, prednisone, vincristine sulfate, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin hydrochloride (hydroxydaunorubicin (EPOCH-R). * Examples include, but are not limited to: * Severe Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related wasting * Sever intractable diarrhea * Active inadequately treated opportunistic infection of the central nervous system (CNS) * Primary CNS lymphoma Primary CNS lymphoma

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression Free Survival at 1 Year1 yearPFS is the time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression. Progression is defined according to the Cheson response criteria. Disease progression as indicated by imaging scans at one year following therapy. Disease progression is defined as increase of 25% or more in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions compared to the smallest previous measurements, or the appearance of any new lesion(s).
Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)The participants were followed for a median of 15.4 years.PFS is the time interval from study entry to documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause. Progression is defined according to the Cheson response criteria. Disease progression is defined as increase of 25% or more in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions compared to the smallest previous measurements, or the appearance of any new lesion(s). Confidence intervals were made, and a Kaplan-Meier curve of progression free survival was constructed.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Overall SurvivalThe participants were followed for survival for a median of 15.4 years.Overall survival is time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive.
1 Year Overall Survival1 yearOverall survival is time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive.
Median Duration of Complete Response/Complete Response UnconfirmedThe participants were followed for duration of complete response or complete response unconfirmed for a median of 15.4 years.Complete response (CR) was assessed by the Cheson response criteria. Complete response is disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm before therapy). Complete response unconfirmed (CRu) is when a residual lymph node mass \> 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters, does not change over the last two treatments, and any biopsies obtained are negative will be considered to be in CR. In organs involved by disease, any residual lesions that have decreased by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters or are \< 1 cm, are consistent with scar, and stable over the last two treatments will be considered to fulfill criteria for CR.
Percentage of Participants With CR/CRu Lasting 1 Year1 yearComplete response (CR) was assessed by the Cheson response criteria. Complete response is disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm before therapy). Complete response unconfirmed (CRu) is when a residual lymph node mass \> 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters, does not change over the last two treatments, and any biopsies obtained are negative will be considered to be in CR. In organs involved by disease, any residual lesions that have decreased by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters or are \< 1 cm, are consistent with scar, and stable over the last two treatments will be considered to fulfill criteria for CR.
Number of Participants With at Least One Hematologic Toxicity Event of Febrile NeutropeniaDate treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 209 months and 17 days.Toxicity was assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0). Febrile neutropenia is defined as a life-threatening complication requiring hospitalization and urgent broad-spectrum antibiotics.
Number of Cycles of Hematologic ToxicityUp to 112 cycles (each cycle is 21 days + 7 days window)Cumulative number of cycles of hematologic toxicity. Hematologic (i.e., decrease in bone marrow and blood cells) toxicity was assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0).
Percentage of Participants With Complete ResponseThe participants were followed for an average of 6 months to determine response to therapy.Complete response was assessed by the Cheson Response Criteria. Complete response is disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm before therapy).
Median Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)Participants were followed for up to 10.2 years to determine their response on interim PET scans.PFS is the time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. Disease progression was assessed by positron emission tomography scans after 2 cycles (each cycle is 21 days + 7 days window) of therapy using the Deauville criteria. Deauville score of 4 or 5 is considered positive on interim PET scan while a Deauville score of 1 or 2 or 3 is considered negative. The outcomes of the Deauville score was compared to determine PET positive progression free survival.
1 Year Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)1 year1-year PFS is defined as participants who remain free of disease progression or death at one year from study entry. We compared the 1-year PFS of participants with negative results on interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans to those with positive results on interim PET scans. PFS is defined as the time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. Disease progression was assessed by positron emission tomography scans after 2 cycles of therapy using the Deauville criteria. Deauville score of 4 or 5 is considered positive on interim PET scan while a Deauville score of 1 or 2 or 3 is considered negative. The outcomes of the Deauville score was compared to determine PET positive progression free survival.
Recovery of CD4 T Cells (CD4) CountsFrom the end of chemotherapy every 3 months for the first 2 yearsParticipants with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who undergo chemotherapy may have a delay in the recovery of their normal CD4+ T-cells. This delay could result in an increased risk of infection. Recovery of CD4 cells counts is the time from end of therapy until the time that the CD4 counts first reached above 200 cells/uL.
Recovery of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral LoadEither following or concurrently with combination chemo and biological therapy, approximately every 6 to 8 weeks after therapy was completed up to 16 monthsThe HIV viral load is a measure of actively replicating virus in the blood. If no anti-retroviral therapy is given, then reduction of this HIV viral load to manageable levels might risk infection. In our study, the recovery of HIV viral load was measured the time from the initiation of antiretroviral therapy until the viral load was undetectable or \< 50 copies.
Overall ResponseThe participants were followed for an average of 6 months to determine response to therapy.Overall response was determined by the Cheson Response Criteria. Participants with either a complete response (CR), complete response unconfirmed or partial response were considered responders. Less than a partial response was considered a non-response to therapy (i.e., Stable Disease and/or Progressive Disease). Complete response was defined as the disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size. Complete response unconfirmed is a residual lymph node mass \> 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters, does not change over the last two treatments, and any biopsies obtained are negative will be considered to be in CR. Partial response is defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions lasting for a period of at least one month.
Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityDate treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 209 months and 17 days.Non-hematologic (i.e., not begin in bone marrow or blood) toxicity was assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0). Grade 3 is severe. Grade 4 is life-threatening. Grade 5 is death related to adverse event.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0)Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 209 months and 17 days.Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological Therapy
Combination chemo and biological therapy Rituximab: 2 doses of rituximab every cycle: first dose on Day 1 and 2nd dose on Day 5 Filgrastim: Filgrastim day 6 until absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reaches 5000 after the nadir, every cycle Etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin hydrochloride (EPOCH): combination chemotherapy: EPOCH every 3 weeks for minimum of 3 cycles and max of 6 cycles
68
Total68

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeclined to participate (before treatment started)1
Overall StudyRefused further treatment2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological Therapy
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
66 Participants
Age, Continuous42.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
32 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
31 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
68 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
57 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
12 / 67
other
Total, other adverse events
66 / 67
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 67

Outcome results

Primary

Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is the time interval from study entry to documented evidence of disease progression or death due to any cause. Progression is defined according to the Cheson response criteria. Disease progression is defined as increase of 25% or more in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions compared to the smallest previous measurements, or the appearance of any new lesion(s). Confidence intervals were made, and a Kaplan-Meier curve of progression free survival was constructed.

Time frame: The participants were followed for a median of 15.4 years.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyMedian Progression Free Survival (PFS)13.8 years
Primary

Progression Free Survival at 1 Year

PFS is the time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression. Progression is defined according to the Cheson response criteria. Disease progression as indicated by imaging scans at one year following therapy. Disease progression is defined as increase of 25% or more in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions compared to the smallest previous measurements, or the appearance of any new lesion(s).

Time frame: 1 year

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyProgression Free Survival at 1 Year79.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

1 Year Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)

1-year PFS is defined as participants who remain free of disease progression or death at one year from study entry. We compared the 1-year PFS of participants with negative results on interim positron emission tomography (PET) scans to those with positive results on interim PET scans. PFS is defined as the time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. Disease progression was assessed by positron emission tomography scans after 2 cycles of therapy using the Deauville criteria. Deauville score of 4 or 5 is considered positive on interim PET scan while a Deauville score of 1 or 2 or 3 is considered negative. The outcomes of the Deauville score was compared to determine PET positive progression free survival.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: 27 participants had no PET scan.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological Therapy1 Year Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)Interim PET scan positive 1-year PFS61.5 percentage of participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological Therapy1 Year Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)Interim PET scan negative 1 year PFS89.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

1 Year Overall Survival

Overall survival is time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological Therapy1 Year Overall Survival83.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Median Duration of Complete Response/Complete Response Unconfirmed

Complete response (CR) was assessed by the Cheson response criteria. Complete response is disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm before therapy). Complete response unconfirmed (CRu) is when a residual lymph node mass \> 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters, does not change over the last two treatments, and any biopsies obtained are negative will be considered to be in CR. In organs involved by disease, any residual lesions that have decreased by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters or are \< 1 cm, are consistent with scar, and stable over the last two treatments will be considered to fulfill criteria for CR.

Time frame: The participants were followed for duration of complete response or complete response unconfirmed for a median of 15.4 years.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyMedian Duration of Complete Response/Complete Response Unconfirmed13.9 years
Secondary

Median Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is the time interval from start of treatment to documented evidence of disease progression or death from any cause. Disease progression was assessed by positron emission tomography scans after 2 cycles (each cycle is 21 days + 7 days window) of therapy using the Deauville criteria. Deauville score of 4 or 5 is considered positive on interim PET scan while a Deauville score of 1 or 2 or 3 is considered negative. The outcomes of the Deauville score was compared to determine PET positive progression free survival.

Time frame: Participants were followed for up to 10.2 years to determine their response on interim PET scans.

Population: 27 participants had no PET scan.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyMedian Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)Interim PET positive participants10.2 years
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyMedian Interim Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Positive Progression Free Survival (PFS)Interim PET negative participantsNA years
p-value: 0.1Two-tailed log rank test
Secondary

Median Overall Survival

Overall survival is time from treatment start date until date of death or date last known alive.

Time frame: The participants were followed for survival for a median of 15.4 years.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyMedian Overall Survival14.2 years
Secondary

Number of Cycles of Hematologic Toxicity

Cumulative number of cycles of hematologic toxicity. Hematologic (i.e., decrease in bone marrow and blood cells) toxicity was assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0).

Time frame: Up to 112 cycles (each cycle is 21 days + 7 days window)

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Cycles of Hematologic ToxicityNeutropenia with a Nadir <500 cells/mm^3112 cycles
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Cycles of Hematologic ToxicityFebrile neutropenia25 cycles
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Cycles of Hematologic ToxicityNeutropenia with a Nadir <100 cells/mm^377 cycles
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Cycles of Hematologic ToxicityThrombocytopenia with a Nadir <50,000 platelets/mm^340 cycles
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Cycles of Hematologic ToxicityThrombocytopenia with a Nadir <25,000 platelets/mm^36 cycles
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Cycles of Hematologic ToxicityAnemia: hemoglobin <8 g/dL36 cycles
Secondary

Number of Participants With at Least One Hematologic Toxicity Event of Febrile Neutropenia

Toxicity was assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0). Febrile neutropenia is defined as a life-threatening complication requiring hospitalization and urgent broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Time frame: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 209 months and 17 days.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With at Least One Hematologic Toxicity Event of Febrile Neutropenia18 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic Toxicity

Non-hematologic (i.e., not begin in bone marrow or blood) toxicity was assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0). Grade 3 is severe. Grade 4 is life-threatening. Grade 5 is death related to adverse event.

Time frame: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 209 months and 17 days.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityConfusion1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityConstipation1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypokalemia1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMyelodysplastic syndrome0 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySerious infection17 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHyponatremia1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityNausea0 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityDiarrhea2 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityDehydration1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMotor neuropathy0 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityPancreatitis1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMucositis/Stomatitis6 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypoxia0 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityLiver test abnormalities6 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityBone pain1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityVision disturbance1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySyncope1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHeadache5 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHyperglycemia4 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityNeurologic event0 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityFatigue2 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypophosphatemia2 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityAnorexia0 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySerious hemorrhage5 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypocalcemia2 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityDiarrhea0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySerious infection0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityNeurologic event0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySyncope0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityConfusion0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMotor neuropathy1 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityVision disturbance0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHyperglycemia0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypophosphatemia1 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypocalcemia0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypokalemia1 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHyponatremia0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityDehydration0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMucositis/Stomatitis0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityLiver test abnormalities1 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityPancreatitis0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityConstipation0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySerious hemorrhage1 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityFatigue0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHeadache0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityBone pain0 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityNausea1 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityAnorexia1 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypoxia4 Participants
Grade 4Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMyelodysplastic syndrome0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityConstipation0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypophosphatemia0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySerious infection0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySerious hemorrhage0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHyperglycemia0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityAnorexia0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityFatigue0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityVision disturbance0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityNeurologic event0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHeadache0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMotor neuropathy0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMyelodysplastic syndrome1 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityBone pain0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityConfusion0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityMucositis/Stomatitis0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypoxia1 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityLiver test abnormalities0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityDehydration0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityNausea0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityPancreatitis0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHyponatremia0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypokalemia0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityDiarrhea0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicityHypocalcemia0 Participants
Grade 5Number of Participants With ≥ Grades 3-5 Non-hematologic ToxicitySyncope0 Participants
Secondary

Overall Response

Overall response was determined by the Cheson Response Criteria. Participants with either a complete response (CR), complete response unconfirmed or partial response were considered responders. Less than a partial response was considered a non-response to therapy (i.e., Stable Disease and/or Progressive Disease). Complete response was defined as the disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size. Complete response unconfirmed is a residual lymph node mass \> 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters, does not change over the last two treatments, and any biopsies obtained are negative will be considered to be in CR. Partial response is defined as a 50% or greater decrease in the sum of the products of the longest perpendicular diameters of all measured lesions lasting for a period of at least one month.

Time frame: The participants were followed for an average of 6 months to determine response to therapy.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started, and one participant was not evaluable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyOverall ResponseComplete Response53 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyOverall ResponseComplete Response Unconfirmed10 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyOverall ResponsePartial Response1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyOverall ResponseNon-Responder - Stable Disease1 Participants
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyOverall ResponseNon-Responder - Progressive Disease1 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response

Complete response was assessed by the Cheson Response Criteria. Complete response is disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm before therapy).

Time frame: The participants were followed for an average of 6 months to determine response to therapy.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started, and one participant was not evaluable.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyPercentage of Participants With Complete Response95 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With CR/CRu Lasting 1 Year

Complete response (CR) was assessed by the Cheson response criteria. Complete response is disappearance of all signs and symptoms of lymphoma for a period of at least one month. All lymph nodes and nodal masses must have regressed to normal size (1.5 cm in their greatest transverse diameter for nodes \> 1.5 cm before therapy). Complete response unconfirmed (CRu) is when a residual lymph node mass \> 1.5 cm in greatest transverse diameter that has regressed by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters, does not change over the last two treatments, and any biopsies obtained are negative will be considered to be in CR. In organs involved by disease, any residual lesions that have decreased by \> 75% in sum of the products of the greatest diameters or are \< 1 cm, are consistent with scar, and stable over the last two treatments will be considered to fulfill criteria for CR.

Time frame: 1 year

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyPercentage of Participants With CR/CRu Lasting 1 Year82.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Recovery of CD4 T Cells (CD4) Counts

Participants with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who undergo chemotherapy may have a delay in the recovery of their normal CD4+ T-cells. This delay could result in an increased risk of infection. Recovery of CD4 cells counts is the time from end of therapy until the time that the CD4 counts first reached above 200 cells/uL.

Time frame: From the end of chemotherapy every 3 months for the first 2 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyRecovery of CD4 T Cells (CD4) Counts2.5 months
Secondary

Recovery of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load

The HIV viral load is a measure of actively replicating virus in the blood. If no anti-retroviral therapy is given, then reduction of this HIV viral load to manageable levels might risk infection. In our study, the recovery of HIV viral load was measured the time from the initiation of antiretroviral therapy until the viral load was undetectable or \< 50 copies.

Time frame: Either following or concurrently with combination chemo and biological therapy, approximately every 6 to 8 weeks after therapy was completed up to 16 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyRecovery of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Viral Load2 months
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0)

Here is the number of participants with serious and/or non-serious adverse events assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0). A non-serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence. A serious adverse event is an adverse event or suspected adverse reaction that results in death, a life-threatening adverse drug experience, hospitalization, disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect or important medical events that jeopardize the patient or subject and may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previous outcomes mentioned.

Time frame: Date treatment consent signed to date off study, approximately 209 months and 17 days.

Population: One participant declined to participate before treatment started.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Arm 1-Combination Chemo and Biological TherapyNumber of Participants With Serious and/or Non-serious Adverse Events Assessed by the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC v2.0)66 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026