Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Use of a Protease Inhibitor and of Interleukin-2 (IL-2) in the Treatment of Early HIV Infection

Randomized, Controlled, Open Label, Multi-Center Phase III Trial Comparing the Safety and Antiviral Activity of a Protease-Containing Regimen (d4T/ddI/IDV/RTV) Versus a Protease-Sparing Regimen (d4T/ddI/EFV) and the Ability of Interleukin-2 to Purge HIV From Latent Stores in Patients With Acute/Early HIV Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00006154
Enrollment
165
Registered
2001-08-31
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2013-09-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Interleukin-2, Didanosine, Drug Therapy, Combination, Stavudine, HIV Protease Inhibitors, Ritonavir, Indinavir, Virus Latency, Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors, Anti-HIV Agents, abacavir, efavirenz, Acute Infection

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to look at the effectiveness of combination anti-HIV drug therapy (with protease inhibitors \[PIs\] or without) in patients with early HIV infections. This study also looks at whether a drug called interleukin-2 (IL-2) can boost the immune system of these patients. Doctors are not sure which anti-HIV drug combination is best to use in patients who have early HIV infection and have never received anti-HIV treatment. PIs are anti-HIV drugs that decrease viral load (level of HIV in the blood). However, PIs can cause serious side effects in some patients. Doctors would like to know if a drug combination that does not contain a PI is just as good as one that contains PIs.

Detailed description

Studies have suggested that an antiretroviral drug regimen of the non-nucleoside agent efavirenz (EFV) in combination with two nucleoside analogues is effective at achieving maximal viral suppression. This provides an alternative treatment to that of the more toxic PI-containing regimen. This trial examines whether a nonPI regimen with EFV is more beneficial than a PI-containing regimen when each is used in combination with the same two nucleoside analogues. A second part of the study looks at whether the addition of IL-2 may offer immunologic benefits as a co-administered drug. Patients are randomized to initiate antiretroviral therapy of a PI-based (stavudine/didanosine/ritonavir \[RTV\]/indinavir \[IDV\]) or nonPI-based (stavudine/didanosine/EFV) regimen. Within these treatment arms, they are stratified according to a positive or negative p24 antigen result. At Week 16, patients not achieving maximal viral suppression (lower than 50 copies/ml) have the option to add abacavir (ABC) or other drugs as intensification therapy. Those achieving virologic suppression (less than 50 copies/ml) are randomized either to receive IL-2 or not. At study entry, and after 12 months, tissue samples of CSF, lymph node, and genital secretions are obtained, with permission. Patients have physical exams, women of child-bearing potential have pregnancy tests, and blood samples are drawn at clinic visits 12-16 times a year over 3 years so that virologic and immunologic evaluations may be performed. Compensation for time and transportation is given.

Interventions

DRUGIndinavir sulfate

400 mg tablets equaling 1600 mg daily

DRUGRitonavir

100 mg liquid capsules equaling 400 mg daily

DRUGAbacavir sulfate

300 mg capsules equaling 600 mg daily. Administration based on individual results after 16 weeks.

DRUGEfavirenz

200 mg capsules equaling 600 mg daily

DRUGStavudine

30-40 mg capsules equaling 60 or 80 mg daily

DRUGDidanosine

250-400 mg E.coated tablets equaling 250 or 400 mg daily

DRUGAldesleukin

Subcutaneous injection equaling 15 x 10\^6 IU daily dose. Administration based on individual results after 16 weeks and randomization.

Sponsors

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
Lead SponsorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients may be eligible for this study if they: * Have been infected recently with HIV. This will be determined by certain lab tests. * Are 18 years of age or older. * Are able to swallow a large number of pills. * Are willing to use barrier methods of birth control (such as condoms) during the study.

Exclusion criteria

Patients will not be eligible for this study if they: * Abuse drugs or alcohol. * Have any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could impair their ability to participate in the study. * Are breast-feeding or pregnant. * Have received any prior anti-HIV drugs. (However, use of anti-HIV drugs to try to prevent infection more than 6 months prior to study entry is allowed.)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Virologic: A. Plasma viral load B. Tissue viral load (CNS, lymphoid tissues, genital tract) C. HIV DNA (proviral) levels in circulating mononuclear cells D. Phenotypic and genotypic antiretroviral drug resistanceThroughout study
Immunologic: A. Evaluation of CD4, CD8, CD45RA, CD45RO phenotypes and defined activation markers B. Evaluation of the diversity and persistence of the T cell repertoire (CD4+, CD8+) in the circulation and lymphoid tissuesThroughout study
Immunologic: C. Functional CD4+ cellular assays (class II MHC tetramers) D. Thymic regeneration as studied by the exclusion circle assay E. Evolution of Western blot banding patterns F. Evolution of anti-HIV neutralizing antibody levelsThroughout study
Clinical: A. Minor opportunistic infections or AIDS-defining conditions B. Death C. Clinical or laboratory adverse events D. Evaluation of adherence to therapy E. Evaluation of lipodystrophyThroughout study

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026