Skip to content

Social Support and CHD Risk Factors--A Community Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00005343
Enrollment
Unknown
Registered
2000-05-26
Start date
1993-01-31
Completion date
1995-12-31
Last updated
2005-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Diseases

Brief summary

To examine the mechanism through which social support affects morbidity and mortality from coronary heart disease.

Detailed description

BACKGROUND: Two hypotheses have been proposed to account for the effects of social support on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Both hypotheses operate through effects on risk factors for coronary heart disease, specifically arterial blood pressure and serum lipids. The stress- buffering hypothesis states that social support functions as a social resource for individuals exposed to social stressors; those persons with more support are less vulnerable to the risk-enhancing effects of stressors. The health behavior hypothesis states that persons with more support engage in more positive health behaviors, such as avoiding tobacco; moderate alcohol use; exercise; and, a prudent diet. A major limitation in research to evaluate these alternative hypotheses has been the failure to conceptualize and measure social support in a way appropriate to detect its effects in varying social and cultural contexts. This is a major issue in research in sub-cultural communities that are also high risk communities, such as African-Americans. DESIGN NARRATIVE: A cross-sectional survey of social stressors, social supports, health behaviors, and arterial blood pressure and serum lipids was conducted in a Black community in the rural South to evaluate the relative strengths of the stress-buffering versus the health behavior hypothesis. Social support was measured using a culturally appropriate technique which was sensitive both to the distinction between kin and nonkin social support, and the modification of the effects of that support by generational status. Multiple regression analysis and path analysis were used to evaluate the alternative hypotheses.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Lead SponsorNIH

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

No eligibility criteria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026