Skip to content

Ifosfamide or Doxorubicin in Treating Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Randomized Phase III Trial of Two Investigational Schedules of Ifosfamide vs. Standard Dose Doxorubicin in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00003212
Enrollment
780
Registered
2004-03-12
Start date
1998-01-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2012-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sarcoma

Keywords

adult angiosarcoma, adult fibrosarcoma, adult leiomyosarcoma, adult liposarcoma, adult neurofibrosarcoma, adult synovial sarcoma, recurrent adult soft tissue sarcoma, adult malignant fibrous histiocytoma, adult malignant hemangiopericytoma, adult rhabdomyosarcoma, stage IV uterine sarcoma, recurrent uterine sarcoma, stage IV adult soft tissue sarcoma

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. It is not yet known whether ifosfamide or doxorubicin is more effective for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma. PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of ifosfamide with that of doxorubicin in treating patients who have advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the progression free survival rate in patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma treated with either of two different regimens of ifosfamide or doxorubicin. II. Assess the toxic effects of these therapies and response rate in these patients. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized into one of 3 arms (continuous ifosfamide, ifosfamide daily for 3 days, or doxorubicin). Patients are stratified by performance status (0 vs 1), liver involvement (no vs yes), histological type (leiomyosarcoma vs synovial sarcoma vs other), and histological grade (1 vs 2 vs 3). Arm I: Patients receive doxorubicin by bolus infusion for 5-20 minutes once every 3 weeks. Arm II: Patients receive ifosfamide by intravenous infusion for 4 hours on days 1, 2, and 3 every three weeks. Arm III: Patients receive ifosfamide by intravenous infusion for 72 hours every 3 weeks. Patients are assessed after every 2 courses of therapy. Each course of therapy consists of 3 weeks of treatment. Patients may receive a maximum of 6 courses of therapy in the absence of toxicity and disease progression. Patients are followed every 12 weeks for survival. PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 780 patients (260 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.

Interventions

DRUGdoxorubicin hydrochloride
DRUGifosfamide

Sponsors

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - EORTC
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: Histologically proven advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma including the following: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma Liposarcoma Rhabdomyosarcoma Synovial sarcoma Malignant paraganglioma Fibrosarcoma Leiomyosarcoma Angiosarcoma including haemangiopericytoma Neurogenic sarcoma Unclassified sarcoma Mixed mesodermal tumor of the uterus Measurable disease with evidence of progression in prior 6 weeks No symptomatic or known CNS metastases PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age: 15 to 65 Performance status: WHO 0-1 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: WBC at least 3000/mm3 Neutrophil count greater than 2,000/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater 1.75 mg/dL Albumin at least 25 g/L Renal: Creatinine clearance greater than 70 mL/min Cardiovascular: No history of uncontrolled cardiovascular disease Other: Fertile women must use effective contraception No other severe medical illness including psychosis No prior primary malignant tumor except: Adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix Basal cell carcinoma PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No radiotherapy to the sole index lesion Surgery: Not specified

Countries

Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026