Skip to content

Laparoscopic Surgery or Standard Surgery in Treating Patients With Endometrial Cancer or Cancer of the Uterus

A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Pelvic and Para-Aortic Node Sampling With Vaginal Hysterectomy and BSO Versus Open Laparotomy With Pelvic and Para-Aortic Node Sampling and Abdominal Hysterectomy and BSO in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma and Uterine Sarcoma, Clinical Stage I, IIA, Grade I, II, III

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00002706
Enrollment
2616
Registered
2003-01-27
Start date
1996-04-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2015-05-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometrial Adenocarcinoma, Stage II Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage II Uterine Sarcoma, Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer, Stage I Uterine Sarcoma

Brief summary

This randomized phase III trial is studying laparoscopic surgery to see how well it works compared to standard surgery in treating patients with endometrial cancer or cancer of the uterus. Laparoscopic surgery is a less invasive type of surgery for cancer of the uterus and may have fewer side effects and improve recovery. It is not known whether laparoscopic surgery is more effective than standard surgery in treating endometrial cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: I. Compare the incidence of surgical complications, peri-operative morbidity, and mortality in patients with stage I or IIa, grade I-III endometrial cancer or uterine cancer undergoing surgical staging through laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy. II. Compare the length of hospital stay after surgery in patients receiving these treatments. III. Compare the quality of life of patients receiving these treatments. IV. Compare the incidence and location of disease recurrence in patients receiving these treatments. OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients undergo vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) via laparoscopy. ARM II: Patients undergo total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO via conventional laparotomy. Patients in both arms also undergo pelvic and para-aortic lymph node sampling. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at 1, 3, and 6 weeks, and then at 6 months. Patients are followed at 6 weeks, every 3 months for 2 years, and then every 6 months for 3 years.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic Surgery

Undergo vaginal hysterectomy and BSO via laparoscopy

OTHERQuality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

PROCEDURETherapeutic Conventional Surgery

Undergo total abdominal hysterectomy and BSO via conventional laparotomy

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Gynecologic Oncology Group
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of stage I or IIA, grade I-III endometrial adenocarcinoma or uterine sarcoma * Must be considered a candidate for surgery * No contraindication to laparoscopy * No clinical or chest x-ray evidence of metastasis beyond the uterine corpus or macroscopic involvement of the endocervix * Performance status - GOG 0-3 * WBC at least 3,000/mm\^3 * Platelet count at least 100,000/mm\^3 * Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal * SGOT no greater than 3 times normal * Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL * Prior malignancy allowed if no current evidence of disease * Not pregnant * No prior pelvic or abdominal radiotherapy * See Disease Characteristics * No prior retroperitoneal surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of disease-free intervalUp to 5 yearsThe usual logrank test or a proportional hazards model will be used to assess the equality of the hazard rates between the surgical procedures.
Frequency of aborting LAVH in order to perform an TAH/BSOUp to 5 years
Frequency of major surgical complications, graded according to the NCI CTC and classified as either less than grade 2 or grade 2 or worseUp to 5 years
Length of hospitalization following surgeryFrom the date of surgery to the date of discharge, assessed up to 5 yearsA proportional odds model will be used to estimate the treatment difference while adjusting for potential confounding factors.
Self assessed quality of life scores as measured by FACT-G, Physical Function Subscale from the MOS SF-36, Wisconsin Brief Pain Inventory, Fear of Relapse/Recurrence scale, and Personal Appearance scaleUp to 6 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026