Skip to content

Comparison of PECS II block and intermediate cervical plexus block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing single port robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy

Comparative study of PECS II block versus cervical plexus block with postoperative pain in patients undergoing single port robot-assisted transaxillary thyroidectomy: double-blinded randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0011999
Enrollment
74
Registered
2026-05-15
Start date
2026-06-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-07-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : The PECS II block is performed under ultrasound guidance using an in-plane technique. A linear transducer is placed at the level of the third intercostal space along the anterior a

Sponsors

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: • Patients aged 19 to 60 years scheduled to undergo single-port transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy (lobectomy or total thyroidectomy) • Patients with suspected Thyroid Cancer on preoperative evaluation whose nodules are classified as T1 or T2 stage (less than 4 cm without invasion of surrounding tissues) • Patients without suspected thyroid cancer on preoperative evaluation who have thyroid nodules with a maximum diameter of less than 4 cm on ultrasonography • Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5 kg/m² or higher and less than 30.0 kg/m²

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: • Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of III or higher. • Patients requiring lateral neck lymph node dissection • Pregnant women • Patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus • Patients with chronic kidney disease • Patients with a history of previous neck surgery • Patients with Graves' Disease • Patients with chronic alcohol use disorder • Patients with preoperative vocal cord paralysis • Patients with severe obesity (BMI = 30.0 kg/m²) • Patients who have participated in another clinical trial within 30 days prior to enrollment • Patients whom the investigators consider unable to complete questionnaires independently • Patients whom the investigators judge to be unsuitable for study participation due to other underlying medical conditions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain score at 4 hour after surgery, assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Pain score at 1 hour after surgery, assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10);Pain score at 24 hour after surgery, assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10);Pain score at postoperative day 2, assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS; 0–10);Frequency and dose of analgesic administration at 1 hour, 4 hours, 24 hours, and postoperative day 2 after surgery;Postoperative nausea/vomiting and other complications ;The Korean version of the Quality of Recovery-15 questionnaire (QoR-15K);axillary/chest wall pain score, assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10);swallowing-related deep neck pain score, assessed using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS, 0–10)

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJung-Woo Shim

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

tintinshim@naver.com+82-2-2258-2236

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Jul 23, 2026