None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Others(Educational intervention) : The intervention in this study utilizes the Nursing GenAI Ethics Toolkit. Developed by Jennie De Gagne et al. (2026), this educational program is designed to structu
Case 2 utilizes paired discussions
and Case 3 engages four-person group discussions. Teams will document their findings, followed by a plenary debriefing. After completing each case, participants will write an individual reflective jou
individual activity to execute AI and comparatively analyze human versus AI judgments (50 minutes)
break (10 minutes)
plenary discussion (30 minutes)
and reflective writing (15 minutes).
Sponsors
Chung-Ang University
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
All
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) graduate students currently enrolled in the relevant course; and (2) individuals who understood the purpose and contents of the study and voluntarily consented to participate.
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) individuals who did not provide voluntary consent to participate in the study; (2) those who failed to fully participate in the classes due to absences or early departures; and (3) individuals with cognitive or linguistic limitations that hindered their ability to complete the study procedures.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Artificial Intelligence Literacy | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| clinical reasoning ability | — |
Countries
Korea, Republic of
Contacts
Public ContactSang Suk Kim
Chung-Ang University
Outcome results
None listed