Skip to content

Comparison of Agreement Between Upper-Arm Cuff–Based and Finger Cuff–Based Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices and Invasive Arterial Pressure in Hypertensive Parturients (Preeclampsia/Eclampsia) Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

Comparison of Agreement Between Upper-Arm Cuff–Based and Finger Cuff–Based Noninvasive Blood Pressure Monitoring Devices and Invasive Arterial Pressure in Hypertensive Parturients (Preeclampsia/Eclampsia) Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0011483
Enrollment
32
Registered
2026-01-16
Start date
2026-02-19
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ? Pregnant women aged 20 years or older ? Parturients diagnosed with preeclampsia or eclampsia (or preeclampsia superimposed on chronic hypertension) ? Patients who are scheduled to undergo cesarean delivery under combined spinal–epidural anesthesia ?Patients who have received sufficient explanation regarding the purpose and methods of the study and have provided written informed consent for study participation and the use of medical records/physiologic signal data

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? Refusal to provide written consent for study participation and the use of personal information/medical records, or withdrawal of consent at any time ? Cases requiring emergency cesarean delivery due to obstetric emergencies (e.g., severe abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, massive bleeding) ? Cases in which accurate measurement by noninvasive blood pressure devices or finger cuff–based noninvasive blood pressure devices is considered difficult due to severe arrhythmias (e.g., atrial fibrillation), implanted pacemaker, severe structural heart disease, or severe aortic stenosis ? Cases in which invasive arterial catheter insertion or application of a finger cuff device is considered technically difficult or hazardous due to the presence of an arteriovenous fistula in the upper limb (for hemodialysis), severe vascular injury from prior surgery or trauma, or severe peripheral vascular disease ? Cases in which the likelihood of failed noninvasive blood pressure measurement (upper-arm cuff–based or finger cuff–based) is considered high due to severe obesity (BMI = 40 kg/m²) ? Cases in which the study explanation and consent process cannot be appropriately conducted due to decreased level of consciousness, inability to cooperate, or cognitive impairment ? Any other cases in which the responsible investigator or attending anesthesiologist determines that study participation is inappropriate considering the patient’s overall condition, comorbidities, and surgical/anesthetic plan

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement of mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the finger cuff–based noninvasive blood pressure device and invasive arterial blood pressure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
difference between the MAP measured by the upper-arm cuff–based oscillometric noninvasive blood pressure device and the MAP measured by invasive arterial blood pressure;Agreement analysis for systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and diastolic arterial pressure (DAP);Trendability of blood pressure changes;Detection performance for hypotensive episodes

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactYu Jeong Bang

Samsung Medical Center

gagreflex.bang@gmail.com+82-2-3410-0369

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026