Comparison of different devices used to place a breathing tube in patients with difficult airways

Comparing tracheal intubation of the Hyperangulated vs Macintosh Videolaryngoscope in patients with difficult airways

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0011274

Enrollment

Registered

2025-12-08

Start date

2025-12-09

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Others(Medical Device) : The intervention in this study is endotracheal intubation performed after induction of general anesthesia using the McGrath® Series 5 video laryngoscope. Participants will be

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients with severely loose or fractured teeth Patients with facial bone fractures Patients with cervical spine injuries Patients with intraoral bleeding

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 35 Pregnant patients Patients receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube before induction of anesthesia Patients requiring nasotracheal intubation Patients with congenital airway or facial anomalies

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Total intubation time: from the grasps the laryngoscope to the time when the laryngoscope blade is removed following successful intubation.	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
percentage of glottis opening, POGO	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHye-min Sohn

Ajou University Hospital

21ambi@hanamail.net+82-31-219-5689

Outcome results