Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Potenza RF Microneedling in Rosacea: A Randomized, Evaluator Blinded, Split Face, Single Center Prospective Trial

Efficacy and Safety of Potenza RF Microneedling in Rosacea: A Randomized, Evaluator Blinded, Split Face, Single Center Prospective Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0011272
Enrollment
60
Registered
2025-12-08
Start date
2025-12-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : Each participant’s left/right facial side is randomized (1:1) to Active RadioFrequency(RF) vs Sham. Two treatment sessions are performed at Week 0 and Week 4. Week 8 is the primary en

Sponsors

Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Age 19–70 years; clinical diagnosis of rosacea (erythematotelangiectatic ± papulopustular) 2. Stable disease for =3 months (no severe flare) 3. Bilateral, symmetric involvement including malar regions (suitable for split face design) 4. Ability to comply with study procedures and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Energy based facial procedures (laser/RF/strong peels) to target areas within 6 months 2. Oral isotretinoin within 3 months; systemic corticosteroids/immunosuppressants within 1 month 3. Pregnancy or lactation; pacemaker/implantable electronic device; active facial infection; keloid tendency 4. Photosensitizing drugs; severe confounding dermatoses (e.g., severe acne) affecting assessments 5. Any condition judged by investigators to preclude safe participation or adherence

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Change from baseline in Clinician Erythema Assessment (CEA, 0–4) on treated vs control sides

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Objective erythema indices: standardized cross polarized/RBX imaging metrics or colorimetry/erythema index (zone wise means);Erythema distribution/intensity:(forehead, each malar region, nose, chin) five zone area proportion (%) and heat map grade;Porphyrin metrics: image based porphyrin score/area ;Skin barrier function: Transepidermal Water Loss(TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH).;Texture/pores: roughness (Ra/Rq) and pore count/mean area ;sensitive skin index (SS 10; 0–100);patient satisfaction (5 point scale).;Safety: immediate pain NRS (0–10); AE rates/severity/duration and relatedness (none/possible/probable/definite);Explore associations between treatment parameters (needle depth, energy level, number of passes) and outcomes;Conduct blinded visual similarity/overall improvement Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) (0–100) on standardized photo pairs.

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyeOne KIM

Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam

hyeonekim@gmail.com+82-2-829-5221

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026