Skip to content

Randomized clinical trial on initial wound healing following interrupted closing sutures with versus without tension-relieving mattress suture in guided bone regeneration procedure

The effect of suture method on primary gingival healing in guided bone graft for horizontal bone defect

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0010574
Enrollment
40
Registered
2025-06-02
Start date
2024-05-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : In guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures in dentistry, gingival suturing was performed as follows: Group 1 (Group S, control): simple interrupted sutures only Group 2 (Group

Sponsors

VHS Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) patients aged over 20 years old (2) patients requiring guided bone regeneration for horizontal bone defects either prior to or during implant placement (3) patients who consented to participate in the study after being fully informed.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with severe cardiovascular, immunological, or infectious conditions (2) patients with uncontrolled diabetes, defined by a fasting blood glucose level of 180 mg/dL or higher (3) patients with complex type of bone defects requiring augmentation in both horizontal and vertical dimensions (4) patients who did not attend the stitch-out appointment two weeks after surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Wound dehiscence width

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Wound dehiscence length;Occurrence rate of wound dehiscence

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactGwanjung Kim

VHS Medical Center

dnflrhkswnd1@naver.com+82-2-2225-1114

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026