Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of the Hemostatic Spray (CG GEL) for Bleeding Control after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection or Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Prospective Randomized Non-Inferiority Study

Efficacy and safety of the hemostatic spray(CG GEL) in bleeding control after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection or Endoscopic Mucosal resection : A prospective randomized controlled study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0010286
Enrollment
180
Registered
2025-03-12
Start date
2025-03-04
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2025-04-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device, Procedure/Surgery : Each group will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group or the control group at Visit 2. Experimental Group: CG Gel Dosage and Administration: dispos

Sponsors

Seoul National University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. A man or woman 19 years of age or older. 2. Patients undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric tumors (dysplasia, early gastric cancer). 3. Individuals willing to participate in the trial, comply with treatment and procedures, and visit the hospital for all required observational assessments. 4. Individuals who have received an explanation of the purpose, methods, etc., of this clinical trial and voluntarily signed the written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Subjects with clinically significant cardiopulmonary disease. 2. Subjects with severe renal dysfunction. 3. Subjects with severe bone marrow dysfunction. 4. Subjects with severe blood coagulation disorders. 5. Subjects with active hepatitis, liver disease that is poorly controlled with treatment, or severe liver dysfunction. 6. Subjects with severe neurological or psychiatric comorbidities. 7. Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 8. Subjects who have an adverse reaction to any component of the investigational medical device (hydroxyethyl cellulose). 9. Subjects who have undergone another endoscopic hemostatic procedure within 7 days prior to the trial. 10. Subjects deemed inappropriate for participation in this clinical trial by the investigator. 11. Subjects for whom the amount of post-procedural bleeding is deemed unmanageable by the investigational device.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the difference in bleeding rates up to 4 weeks after the procedure between the control group, which received conventional hemostasis treatment, and the CGGel group, applied to iatrogenic ulcer lesions that occurred after endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of the difference in acute bleeding rates between the two groups;Comparison of the difference in delayed bleeding rates between the two groups;Procedure duration;Post-procedure complication rate;Operator satisfaction with the treatment in the experimental and control groups

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyunsoo Chung

Seoul National University Hospital

hschungmd@gmail.com+82-10-3365-5628

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026