Skip to content

Building an Expert Psychological Intervention Dataset : A Pilot Study

Building an Expert Psychological Intervention Dataset : A Pilot Study

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0009826
Enrollment
23
Registered
2024-10-04
Start date
2023-11-22
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Yonsei University
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Participant Criteria Study 1: Male or female students aged 19 or older, currently enrolled or on leave from a university or graduate school. Study 2: Male or female aged 19 or older (in their 20s or 30s).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Client Study 1 Participants who reported any of the following results in a screening survey using PHQ-9 and GAD-7: Both PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores are 4 or below (below the cutoff point). Either PHQ-9 or GAD-7 score is 10 or above (moderate level or higher). ? If both scales are below the cutoff point, it is considered that there are no emotional or adaptive problems that require cognitive-behavioral therapy. Therefore, the participants would gain very little benefit from participating in the study and were excluded. Additionally, scores at the ‘moderate’ level or higher on each scale suggest a state requiring more active clinical intervention, making them unsuitable for this study. Participants who cannot regularly visit the institution once a week within the available consultation hours. Study 2 Participants who reported any of the following results in a screening survey using PHQ-9 and GAD-7: Both PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores are 4 or below (below the cutoff point). Either PHQ-9 or GAD-7 score is 15 or above (moderate level or higher). ? If both scales are below the cutoff point, it is considered that there are no emotional or adaptive problems that require cognitive-behavioral therapy. Therefore, the participants would gain very little benefit from participating in the study and were excluded. Additionally, scores exceeding the ‘moderate’ level on each scale suggest a state requiring more active clinical intervention, making them unsuitable for this study. Participants with results indicating a risk level in SBQ-R (Suicidal Behavior Questionnaire-Revised) and IES-R (Impact of Event Scale-Revised): SBQ-R: 7 or above IES-R: 24 or above ? Scores exceeding the ‘normal’ level on both scales suggest a state requiring more active clinical intervention, making them unsuitable for this study. Participants diagnosed with developmental disorders, severe mental disorders, PTSD, eating disorders, etc., by a psychiatrist in the past, and are expected to experience problems that cannot be addressed by the counseling content provided in this study. Participants who cannot regularly visit the institution once a week within the available consultation hours.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Counseling Outcomes : Working Alliance : Counseling Satisfaction

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Session Impact Scale

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSONG NURIM

Yonsei University

nulimi7@gmail.com+82-2-2123-7536

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026