Quality of Recovery: Conventional Management vs. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery with Total Intravenous Anesthesia

Difference in Quality of Recovery between Patients Undergoing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program with Total Intravenous Anesthesia and Conventional Management

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0009525

Enrollment

Registered

2024-06-13

Start date

2024-06-12

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2025-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery, Dietary Supplement, Others : Participants are randomly assigned into two groups, with one group applying enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for perioperative care, and the other

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: People who undergo gynecological robotic surgery under general anesthesia at the researching medical center

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) ASA physical status classification = ‘ASA IV’ 2) Body mass index = 35 3) Diabetic autonomic neuropathy 4) Gastric emptying delay or hiatal hernia 5) Allergic to local anesthetics 6) Participation in other prospective clinical studies that may affect postoperative course 7) Incapable of responding to the questionnaire (e.g. cognitive impairment)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
QoR-15K	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Length of stay;readmission;major postoperative complication	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSeung Woo Song

Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine

yonfong@yonsei.ac.kr+82-33-741-1536

Outcome results