Skip to content

The Effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty using New Implants

A Comparative Study of Clinical and Radiological Outcomes between Traditional Implants and New Implants in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Prospective Enrollment and Retrospective Chart Analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0009512
Enrollment
208
Registered
2024-06-05
Start date
2024-06-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Korea University Ansan Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ? Patients diagnosed with primary osteoarthritis who visited our hospital, underwent conservative treatments (medication, physical therapy) for symptomatic relief, but still experienced uncontrolled pain, leading them to undergo total knee arthroplasty. ? Research subjects who have comprehended the study's content and consented to participate in the research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? Patients aged below 60 or above 80. ? Patients requiring revision knee arthroplasty. ? Patients with secondary arthritis other than primary osteoarthritis (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, gouty arthritis, lupus arthritis, post-traumatic arthritis, etc.). ? Patients who have undergone previous knee surgeries involving bone manipulation (e.g., osteotomy, fracture, ligament reconstruction). ? Patients who have undergone other surgical treatments concurrently with total knee arthroplasty, excluding primary knee replacement. ? Patients with a lower limb axis deviation of 15 degrees or more on weight-bearing radiographs (hip-knee-ankle axis). ? Patients anticipated or confirmed to have a bone defect of 5mm or more in the medial or lateral condyle of the femur during preoperative planning or at the time of surgery. ? Patients with poor bone quality confirmed during surgery, necessitating the use of a femoral or tibial stem. ? Patients experiencing postoperative medical emergencies requiring additional treatment (e.g., myocardial infarction, acute respiratory distress syndrome, stroke, etc.).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative clinical outcomes (WOMAC score, KOOS, SMC score, SF 36)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative clinical outcomes (WOMAC score, KOOS, SMC score, SF 36)

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyung Jun Park

Korea University Ansan Hospital

ppakyung@hotmail.com+82-31-412-5049

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026