Skip to content

Revascularization versus Medical Treatment in Patients with Ischemic Left Ventricular dysfunction

Revascularization versus Medical Treatment in Patients with Ischemic Left Ventricular dysfunction Randomized Controlled Trial of Revascularization Versus Medical Treatment on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Reduced Left Ventricular Function (RESTORE-PCI)

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0008380
Enrollment
900
Registered
2023-04-25
Start date
2023-06-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2024-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : After work up including coronary angiography with invasive physiologic assessment and myocardial viability test is finished, the patients who are eligible for enrollment without an

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Inclusion criteria ? Patients with stage C heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction50% with proven inducible myocardial ischemia by invasive physiologic assessment) ? Coronary artery disease is amenable for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) ? Subject is able to verbally confirm understandings of risks, benefits and treatment alternatives of receiving invasive approach and he/she or his/her legally authorized representative provides written informed consent prior to any study related procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 2) Exclusion criteria ? Myocardial infarction by universal definition within 4 weeks of randomization ? Non-viable myocardium in myocardial viability test (cardiac magnetic resonance, dobutamine-stress echocardiography, delayed single-photon emission computerized tomography, or aneurysmal change in echocardiography) ? Target lesions not amenable for PCI by operators’ decision ? Patients who need left ventricular assisted device (LVAD) or heart transplantation at the time of randomization ? Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Heparin, or Everolimus ? Known true anaphylaxis to contrast medium (not allergic reaction but anaphylactic shock) ? Pregnancy or breast feeding ? Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <2 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator’s medical judgment) ? Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Time to first event of MACE (a composite of death, MI, admission for heart failure, advanced heart failure requiring LVAD or transplantation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
All-cause death;Cardiac death;Any MI, defined by Forth Universal definition of MI;Spontaneous MI, defined by Forth Universal definition of MI;Procedure-related MI, defined by ARC II definition;Admission for heart failure (acute decompensated heart failure);Advanced heart failure requiring LVAD or transplantation;Incidence of Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-D) for documented ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (secondary prevention).;Clinically-indicated unplanned revascularization;Stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic);EQ-5D-5L (quality of life) at 6 month;SAQ (angina severity) at 6 month;Total medical cost;Left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 month – 1 year follow-up;NT-proBNP, pg/mL at 6 month – 1 year follow-up

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJoo Myung Lee

Samsung Medical Center

drone80@hanmail.net+82-2-2148-7250

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026