Comparisons of cold endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy

Comparisons of cold endoscopic mucosal resection and cold snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm sized colorectal polyps, multi-center randomized controlled trial

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0008180

Enrollment

658

Registered

2023-02-10

Start date

2023-02-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : 1. experimental group : cold EMR on 4-9mm size colorectal polyp 2. active comparator group : cold snare polypectomy on 4-9mm size colorectal polyp In cold EMR, endoscopist submuco

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients will be included in the study if they fulfill the following criteria: • Age of >19 years able to provide written informed consent • patient with 4-9 mm sized colorectal polyp

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded in the study if they fulfill the following criteria: • Age of <19 years • inable to provide written informed consent • patient with confirmed malignant polyp, suspected malignant polyp, previously incomplete resection polyp, subepithelial lesion • inflammatory bowel disease patients, uninterrupted antithrombotic therapy patients, coagulopathy patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
complete resection rate as determined by resection margin histological assessment (two side and base)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
en bloc resection rate; R0 resection rate;intra-procedural and post-procedural adverse effect(immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding, immediate perforation, delayed perforation, post polypectomy syndrome)	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactChang Kyo Oh

Hallym University Medical Center-Kangnam

ckdryekd@gmail.com+82-2-829-5120

Outcome results