Skip to content

Tailored versus Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy intended After Optimized Drug Eluting Stent

Tailored versus Conventional Antiplatelet Strategy intended After Optimized Drug Eluting Stent

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0007408
Enrollment
3944
Registered
2022-06-16
Start date
2022-08-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Drug : Eligible subjects providing written informed consent will be randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to either tailored antiplatelet strategy (1-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel for CCS or 3-mont

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Men or women =18 years 2) Typical chest pain or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia suitable for PCI 3) Significant de novo coronary artery lesions suitable for DES implantation 4) Patients who underwent optimized stent implantation either by IVUS or OCT 5) The patient or guardian agrees to the study protocol and the schedule of clinical follow-up, and provides informed, written consent, as approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board/Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Angiographic exclusion criteria: any of the followings 1. Bypass graft lesions 2. Lesions in which impaired delivery of imaging catheters is expected: - Extreme angulation (=90°) proximal to or within the target lesion. - Excessive tortuosity (= two 45° angles) proximal to or within the target lesion. - Heavy calcification proximal to or within the target lesion. 2) In-stent restenosis 3) Hypersensitivity or contraindication to device material and its degradants and cobalt, chromium, nickel, platinum, tungsten, acrylic and fluoro polymers that cannot be adequately pre-medicated. 4) Persistent thrombocytopenia (platelet count <80,000/l) 5) Any history of hemorrhagic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage / TIA or ischemic stroke within the past 6 months 6) A known intolerance or hypersensitivity to a study drug (aspirin, clopidogrel or ticagrelor) or heparin 7) Patients requiring long-term oral anticoagulants or cilostazol 8) Any surgery requiring general anesthesia or discontinuation of aspirin and/or an ADP antagonist is planned within 12 months after the procedure. 9) A diagnosis of cancer (other than superficial squamous or basal cell skin cancer) in the past 3 years or current treatment for the active cancer. 10) Any clinically significant abnormality identified at the screening visit, physical examination, laboratory tests, or electrocardiogram which, in the judgment of the Investigator, would preclude safe completion of the study. 11)History of liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh B or C) or biliary tract obstruction 12)Life expectancy < 1 years for any non-cardiac or cardiac causes 13)Cardiogenic shock at the index admission 14)Patient’s pregnant or breast-feeding 15)Active bleeding or extreme-risk for major bleeding (e.g. active peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal pathology with a high risk for bleeding, malignancies with a high risk for bleeding) 16)Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
1) clinically relevant bleeding [Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, or 5];2) net clinical outcome defined as a composite of all-cause death, MI, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), and clinically relevant bleeding [BARC 2, 3, or 5];3) ischemic composite adverse event of all-cause death, MI, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
1) Major or minor bleeding according to definitions from TIMI and International Society of Thrombosis or Hemostasis (ISTH);2) % difference of strut coverage on FU OCT between optimal vs. suboptimal DES implantation group

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public Contactjisue hong

Asan Medical Center

sue5165@naver.com+82-2-2045-3798

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026