A study on the effectiveness of an exercise program applied with an exercise assistance robot for normal elderly subjects and the usability evaluation of the exercise assistance robot

Evaluation of effectiveness and usability of exercise program applied with exercise assistance robot for normal elderly sujects

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0007367

Enrollment

Registered

2022-06-08

Start date

2022-05-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Others(An exercise program with an exercise assistant robot) : ? This study is going to compare and analyze the exercise program before and after application of the exercise assistance robot as a sing

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Normal elderly aged 65 to less than 85 years without a history of central nervous system disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Those who have difficulty walking independently due to problems such as visual field defects or fractures - Severe arthritis or orthopedic problems limiting passive range of motion (ROM) of the lower extremities (knee flexion contracture >10°, knee flexion ROM 25°, ankle plantar flexion contracture >15°) one who has - When it is difficult to understand exercise program performance due to severe cognitive decline (Simplified Mental State Examination, Korean-Mini-Mental State Examination, K-MMSE=10) - Those who have difficulty participating in exercise programs due to adult diseases such as uncontrolled high blood pressure and diabetes - Those who are at risk of falling while walking due to severe dizziness - Persons judged to be inappropriate by other researchers - Those who are less than 140 cm in height or more than 185 cm in height that are not suitable for the size of the walking assistance robot - Those who are overweight based on body mass index (BMI) of 35 or higher

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
usability evaluation questionnaire	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Muscle thickness and fat layer thickness using rehabilitation ultrasound image;Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-K questionnaire);Quality of life evaluation (SF-12 questionnaire);KFES-I questionnaire;Time Up and Go(TUG)+wearable inertial sensor (G-sensor);surface Electromyography (sEMG);Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB);Manual Muscle Test;Functional reaching test;Dynamic balance test - Four square step test;Berg balance Scale (BBS);10 meter walk test	—

Measure

Time frame

Muscle thickness and fat layer thickness using rehabilitation ultrasound image;Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-K questionnaire);Quality of life evaluation (SF-12 questionnaire);KFES-I questionnaire;Time Up and Go(TUG)+wearable inertial sensor (G-sensor);surface Electromyography (sEMG);Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB);Manual Muscle Test;Functional reaching test;Dynamic balance test - Four square step test;Berg balance Scale (BBS);10 meter walk test

—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactShin Jang-hoon

Sahmyook University

hoon2612@naver.com+82-2-3399-1633

Outcome results