Comparison of the effects of I-gel and LMA flexible use on postoperative temporomandibular joint dysfunction

Comparison of the effects of I-gel and LMA flexible use on postoperative temporomandibular joint dysfunction in non-paralyzed patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0007294

Enrollment

146

Registered

2022-05-18

Start date

2022-05-27

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : Patients are randomly assigned to an I-gel or flexible LMA group, and the allocated LMA is inserted. The LMA Flexible cuff is allowed to be inflated the cuff, and the connected tube i

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ThePatients over 18 years and ASA classification 1-3 who are undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with LMA insertion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Refusal of the patient 2) The patient without teeth or with dentures. 3) Head and neck surgery 4) In case LMA cannot be used due to oral problems or mechanical ventilation disorders 5) Body mass index (BMI) > 40kg/m2

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
the difference of the maximal interincisal distance between before and after surgery	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Difference in distance of the front and rear, left and right jaw movements between before and after surgery;Difference in the angle of TMJ during LMA insertion;Functional assessment through questionnaire	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJiyeon Park

Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center

blestbelle@naver.com+82-2-2001-1383

Outcome results