The effects of environmental prenatal program on environmental health perception and behavior using internet-based intervention in Korea: a non-randomized controlled study

Impact of Internet-based Educational Intervention for Environmental Health Behavior among Pregnant Women

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0007086

Enrollment

Registered

2022-03-17

Start date

2021-04-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2022-04-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Others(internet-based Educational Intervention) : For the experimental group, the prenatal education program was conducted by researchers and midwives via Zoom video conferencing in April, July, Septe

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) pregnant women at over four weeks’ gestation and aged 18 or older, 2) women who wanted to participate in the IEPP, 3) women who participated for the full 4 weeks, and 4) women who had a smart gadget.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) pregnant women who were hospitalized for health problems during pregnancy and 2) pregnant women who could not read Korean.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Environmental health perceptions scales measure severity, susceptibility, response efficacy, self-efficacy, benefit, and barriers. (1) Severity scale (10 items: chemicals, electromagnetic waves, harmful foods), (2) Susceptibility scale (11 items: reproductive health and general health), (3) Response efficacy (10 items: avoiding toxicants and pursuit of health), (4) Self-efficacy (14 items: prevention efficacy, judgment efficacy, control efficacy). (5) Benefits scale (8 items: psychological, physical benefits), (6) Barriers scale (10 items: negative atmosphere, burden). Answers are provided using a 5-point Likert scale, the higher score indicates higher environmental health perception. ;The environmental health behavior scales measure personal and community health behaviors. (1) Personal health behaviors(14 items : lifestyle, personal goods, food, fine dust), (2) Community health behaviors(16 items : reduction, involvement, recycling, reuse). Answers are provided using a 5-point Likert scale, the higher score indicates more environmental health behaviors.	—

Measure

Time frame

Environmental health perceptions scales measure severity, susceptibility, response efficacy, self-efficacy, benefit, and barriers. (1) Severity scale (10 items: chemicals, electromagnetic waves, harmful foods), (2) Susceptibility scale (11 items: reproductive health and general health), (3) Response efficacy (10 items: avoiding toxicants and pursuit of health), (4) Self-efficacy (14 items: prevention efficacy, judgment efficacy, control efficacy). (5) Benefits scale (8 items: psychological, physical benefits), (6) Barriers scale (10 items: negative atmosphere, burden). Answers are provided using a 5-point Likert scale, the higher score indicates higher environmental health perception. ;The environmental health behavior scales measure personal and community health behaviors. (1) Personal health behaviors(14 items : lifestyle, personal goods, food, fine dust), (2) Community health behaviors(16 items : reduction, involvement, recycling, reuse). Answers are provided using a 5-point Likert scale, the higher score indicates more environmental health behaviors.

—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Education satisfaction scale consists of 3 items: feasibility, accessibility, and overall satisfaction. Answers are provided using a 10-point Likert scale, the higher score indicates higher environmental health perception.	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactGeum Hee Jeong

Hallym University

ghjeong@hallym.ac.kr+82-33-248-2713

Outcome results