FindTrial
Sign In

Comparing the efficacy of PEG vs OST bowel preparation protocols using IPTW statistical analysis

Comparing the efficacy of PEG vs OST bowel preparation protocols using IPTW statistical analysis

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0006943
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2022-01-19
Start date
2022-01-11
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: We plan to conduct a study on adult men and women who underwent colonoscopy through an outpatient clinic from August 2021 to November 2021.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: In case the bowel preparation (BBPS score) for each segment is unknown. In case of failure to perform complete insertion (cecal intubation) When the insertion time or the total required time are unknown Inpatient (excluded because characteristics are different from those of outpatients)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in adenoma detection rate between PEG vs OST bowel preparation protocol through single-institution chart analysis for patients who underwent screening/non-screening colonoscopy.—

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
We plan to verify whether there are differences in the bowel preparation score for each PEG and OST bowel preparation (BBPS score, Boston Bowel Preparation Score), insertion time for each bowel preparation, total endoscopic observation time, and bowel preparation score for each intestinal segment.—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSeung Eun Lee

Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital

yse925@naver.com+82-31-961-7757

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026