Comparative study of two endoscopic resection techniques (endoscopic submucosal dissection vs. modified endoscopic mucosal resection) for the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors 10mm or smaller in size, which was diagnosed with forcep biopsy.

Comparison of treatment outcome between modified endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for biopsy proven rectal neuroendocrine tumor: a KASID multicenter randomized study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0006881

Enrollment

132

Registered

2021-12-30

Start date

2021-12-31

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2026-01-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : Theeligiblepopulation,whowere diagnosed asrectalNET by biopsy,willundergooneoftwoprocedure modified endoscopic mucosal resection (m-EMR)orendoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. sized 10mm or smaller 2. proven by biopsy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. patients who didn't underwent biopsy 2. patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resecton

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Rate of complete resection	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
perforation (immediate, delayed);bleeding (immediate, delayed bleeding)	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactTae-Geun Gweon

The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital

gweontae@naver.com+82-32-340-2228

Outcome results