Conventional method versus pocket creation method in endoscopic submucosal dissection

Conventional method versus pocket creation method in endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric body tumor by using dual knife: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0006744

Enrollment

240

Registered

2021-11-11

Start date

2021-12-25

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : The patients who had undergone an ESD due to gastric tumor at Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital and Konkuk University Medical Center are enrolled. To be eligible for

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients scheduled for gastric ESD treatment for gastric body tumors (patients with early cancer, adenoma, calcinoid, and huge hyperplastic polyp) 2. Patients who consented to the informed consent 3. Endoscopists must have more than 10 years of ESD treatment experience.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients refusing consent 2. Under 20, over 90 3. Pregnancy 4. When the lesion is removed by other procedure than ESD. (eg, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or conventional polypectomy) 5. More than one ESD procedure per day

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
ESD outcomes (completeness of resection, complications)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
procedure time ;inflammatory response and abdominal symptoms after ESD	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSang Pyo Lee

Hallym University Medical Center-Dongtan

ultra_pyo@hanmail.net@ultra_pyo@hanmail.ne+82-31-8086-2858

Outcome results