Skip to content

Comparison of high flow nasal cannula and conventional nasal cannula during sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

Comparison of high flow nasal cannula and conventional nasal cannula during sedation for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0006618
Enrollment
64
Registered
2021-09-29
Start date
2021-09-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-02-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : During endoscopic submucosal resection, the control group receives oxygen using a conventional nasal cannula, and the test group receives oxygen using a high-flow nasal cannula.

Sponsors

Samsung Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA physical status I to III Patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients under the age of 18 - Patients requiring oxygen therapy - Patients unable to breathe through the nasal - Patients with severe impaired coagulation profile or who may have nasal bleeding - Patients who have developed or worsened congestive heart failure within the last 6 months - Patients with increased intracranial pressure - Patients with ASA class IV or higher - Patients with unstable hemodynamics - Patients with a history of pneumothorax - Patients with oral and nasal infections - Pregnant or lactating women - Patients who do not understand this study and who refuse the study - Patients with a history of serious psychological disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
lowest oxygen saturation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Hypoxia(SpO2=60) and duration of time;Procedural interruption for increased saturation(jaw thrust, Patient stimulation, increase oxygen flow, dose adjustment, ,nasal airway insertion, ambu bagging, LMA insertion);adverse effect (Xeromycteria, Rhinalgia);operator satisfaction (1-5);mean of oxygen saturation;Post procedure chest X-ray ;Whether oxygen is administered when leaving the recovery room;First oxygen saturation after oxygen ceased in recovery room;First oxygen saturation after arrival at the ward;Whether to maintain oxygen administration after arrival at the ward;PtCO2 value;incidence of SpO2 < 95

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJoan Seungwon Lee

Samsung Medical Center

seungwon0209.lee@samsung.com+82-2-3410-0369

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026