Comparison of Twitchview vs. Stimpod on the impact on the quality of MEP monitoring and the quality of neuromuscular monitoring

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0006524

Enrollment

Registered

2021-09-01

Start date

2021-12-13

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2023-03-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : All subjects monitor both Twitchview and Stimpod, but during induction and maintenance of anesthesia, the TV group performs anesthesia induction and maintenance based on the TOF of Tw

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: ASA class 1- 3

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: hemiparesis or Hemiplegia patients taking anticonvulsant

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Measure MEP amplitude at 15-minute intervals (mean and CV)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Vocal cord status;Time to recover the TOF count to 4 on each instrument;Time to recover the TOF ratio to 20% for each instrument;Record the TOF values for each instrument at 5-minute intervals;Mean and CV of TOFR;Time taken for each instrument to reach a TOF ratio of 50, 75, or 90;Time at which TOF count becomes 0 (each monitors)	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJoan Seungwon Lee

Samsung Medical Center

seungwon0209.lee@samsung.com+82-2-3410-0369

Outcome results