Skip to content

Who is the best rehabilitation candidate for the Robotic-Assisted-Gait-Training (RAGT) in hemiparetic stroke patients?

Who is the best rehabilitation candidate for the Robotic-Assisted-Gait-Training (RAGT) in hemiparetic stroke patients?

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0006461
Enrollment
57
Registered
2021-08-19
Start date
2021-07-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Others(Robotic assisted gait training ) : Experimental group: FAC < 2 (‘low entering functional ambulation category’, LFAC) robotic assisted gait training Control group: FAC = 2 (‘high entering funct

Sponsors

YONSEI UNIVERSITY MIRAE CAMPUS
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. subacute cortical/subcortical ischemic stroke 2. age between 18 and 99 years 3. Fugl-Meyer sensory score >2 4. suitability for gait training as assessed clinically (ability to ambulate at least one step with a device/assistance) 5. height: 132–200 cm 6. hip-knee joint length: 33–48 cm 7. knee joint – foot length, 33–48 cm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. cerebellar/brainstem stroke survivor 2. body weight >135 kg 3. uncontrolled hypertension with blood pressure >160/100 mmHg 4. cardiopulmonary impairments affecting the ambulation test 5. integumentary impairment, such as skin breakdown or bedsores around the suspension belt loading region 6. significant and persistent mental illness 7. lower extremity fixed contracture or deformity 8. bone instability (non-consolidated fractures, unstable spinal column, or severe osteoporosis necessitating treatment with bisphosphonates) 9. other neurodegenerative disorders (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease) 10. MAS >3 in the affected leg 11. significant back or leg pain resulting in an inability to tolerate movement 12. decreased sensation impairing the ability to perceive whether the device is properly fitted

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Fugl-Meyer assessment;Modified Ashworth Scale;Berg balance scale;Trunk impairment scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The walking steps ;walking distance

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactWonjun Oh

YONSEI UNIVERSITY MIRAE CAMPUS

sdc01047@naver.com+82-33-760-2957

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026