Skip to content

Efficacy according to approaches of intra-articular injections for the treatment of frozen shoulder

Comparison of efficacy according to approaches of intra-articular injections for the treatment of frozen shoulder: via rotator interval versus posterior approach (Randomized controlled trial)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0006418
Enrollment
90
Registered
2021-08-03
Start date
2019-07-17
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Primary frozen shoulder patients with age = 20 years 2) Shoulder pain with limitation of passive motion of greater than30 degrees in two or more planes of movement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Secondary frozen shoulder combined with othes shoulder disorders including rotator cuff injury, osteoarthritis, or instability. 2) Previous steroid injection on the affected side within 3 months 3) History of previous shoulder surgery 4) Bleeding diathesis 5) poor cognitive function 6) Patients with inflammatory musculoskeletal system such as rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathies 7) Patients with cervical pain 8) Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Visual analog pain score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, subjective shoulder value

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
range of motion

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactChul-Hyun Cho

Keimyung University Dongsan Hospital

oscho5362@dsmc.or.kr+82-53-258-7924

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026