Skip to content

A comparison of outcomes according to the approach methods in endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric body tumor

A comparison of outcomes according to the approach methods in endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric body tumor by using dual knife: conventional method versus pocket creation method

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0006402
Enrollment
100
Registered
2021-07-29
Start date
2021-09-01
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hallym University Medical Center-Dongtan
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. The patients who had undergone an ESD due to gastric tumor at Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital (Hwaseong, Korea) from September 2018 to present 2. the tumors located in the gastric body portion 3. the procedure performed by the SPL (Sang Pyo Lee) with more than 10 years of ESD experience.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. The tumors resected by other methods, including endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and conventional polypectomy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
ESD outcomes (completeness of resection, complications)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
procedure time

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSang Pyo Lee

Hallym University Medical Center-Dongtan

ultra_pyo@hanmail.net+82-31-8086-2858

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026