Effect of laryngeal mask airway insertion using tongue depressor and stylet

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0006394

Enrollment

170

Registered

2021-07-28

Start date

2021-08-05

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : When inserting a laryngeal mask airway under general anesthesia, the conventional blinding method and the new method using a tongue depressor and a stylet are compared.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Class I - II of American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status classification system -Patients aged 18 to less than 70 years -Body mass index (BMI) less than 30 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Patients who refused to participate - Patients whose mouth does not open more than 2.5cm - Patients at risk of aspiration of gastric contents (esophageal hiatus hernia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, full stomach, etc.) - pregnant women - Patients weighing less than 45 kg or more than 100 kg - Patients with lung disease - In case of surgery in the prone or lateral decubitus position - Patients who are expected to have difficulty in tracheal intubation or manual mask bagging ventilation - Patients with anatomical abnormalities in the cervical spine and upper and lower airways

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Initial success rate of laryngeal mask insertion	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Time taken for laryngeal mask airway insertion;oropharyngeal leak pressure ;Laryngeal evaluation with flexible bronchoscopy;Sore throat, dysphagia, dysphonia, oral bleeding	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJi-yoon Kim

Hanyang University Seoul Hospital

irisjy00@hanmail.net+82-2-2290-8680

Outcome results