None listed
Conditions
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: 1. Patients with pancreatic cancer confirmed by imaging (CT, MRI, PET-CT) 2. Patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed using cytology by endoscopic ultrasound 3. Patients who underwent surgical treatment with pancreatic cancer
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: 1. Minors under the age of 19, vulnerable subjects such as illiteracy 2. Excludes necrotic specimens
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Compare the results of immunofluorescence staining and immunochemical staining according to the type of brush cell slide (thinprep, surepath, direct smear) to confirm the correlation with the final diagnosis name. (With a correlation of 80% or more, the optimal staining method with the highest correlation is identified.) | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Efficacy of staining method(the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value) | — |
Countries
Korea, Republic of
Contacts
Yonsei University Health System, Gangnam Severance Hospital