Skip to content

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group blocking vs periarticular injection after total hip arthroplaslty - Prospective study -

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of pericapsular nerve group blocking vs periarticular injection after total hip arthroplaslty - Prospective study -

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0006049
Enrollment
60
Registered
2021-03-31
Start date
2020-07-16
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2021-04-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : An anesthetic in the experimental group was injected between the psoas tendon and the pubic ramus with a mixture of 20 ml of ropivacaine and 10 ml of normal saine while watching ul

Sponsors

Chungnam National University Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1) Men and women over 18 years of age 2) Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty under the diagnosis of arthritis after the IRB approval date 3) Patients who have completed the survey among patients admitted to the hospital for more than 48 hours after surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1) Patients who were hospitalized for more than 48 hours after surgery and did not faithfully participate in the survey, or were discharged within 48 hours unplanned and failed to complete the survey 2) Patients who have undergone total hip arthroplasty due to reoperation, infectious disease, or fracture rather than simple total hip arthroplasty. 3) Patients with side effects related to nerve group blockage before surgery or periarticular capsule injection during surgery 4) Patients with diseases such as delirium/dementia are excluded 5) If the patient does not agree to participate in the test

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Statistically analyzed whether there was a significant difference in the degree of pain reduction between the experimental group and the control group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Statistical analysis was made to see if there was a significant difference in the quality of recovery between the experimental group and the control group, and whether the shortening of hospitalization period accordingly occurred.

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJeong Kil Lee

Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital

myhomejungle@hanmail.net+82-42-338-2480

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026