A comparison of success rate of two dental bioceramic cements used in vital pulp therapy

A randomized controlled trial on the clinical success rate of vital pulp therapy using calcium silicate based bioceramic and ProRoot MTA on permanent and primary teeth.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0005734

Enrollment

200

Registered

2021-01-04

Start date

2020-12-28

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : 1) Endocem MTA Premixed - Inserted in cavity 2) ProRoot MTA - Inserted in cavity In both case, same procedure of partial pulpotomy has done

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Pulp exposured matured tooth or primary tooth with ? Normal mobility and percussion ? without unknown pain ? Hemostasis can be done within 3-5 minutes with wet cotton ? No internal root resorption observed ? No periapical radiolucency ? Available to restore with composite resin or indirect restoration(Permanent tooth), Crown restoration(Primary tooth)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: ? Spontaneous pain ? Unusual mobility and percussion test result ? Swelling or sinus tract on gum ? No tooth vitality observed ? Fail to hemostasis 5 minutes after pulpotomy

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Pulp survival rate	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Tooth survival rate	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactJunghoon Lee

Yonsei University Health System, Dental Hospital

Outcome results