Effects of robot-assisted gait training using end-effector type robot (Morning Walk?) in stroke and spinal cord injury patients

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0005705

Enrollment

182

Registered

2020-12-28

Start date

2021-05-20

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : Subjects will be randomly assigned to RAGT(robot-assisted gait training) group or CT(conventional therapy) group. RAGT group will get one time of RAGT and two times of CT per day,

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Stroke a) Patients with stroke over the age of 19 b) Patients less than one year of onset c) Patients with Functional Ambulatory Category score 3 or below and a Trunk Control Test (TCT) score of 49 or above d) Independently ambulatory before the onset of the current stroke 2. SCI a) Patients with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI over the age of 19 b) Patients less than one year of onset c) Patients with upper motor neuron damage with neurological level of injury (NLI) from C2 to T12 d) Patients classified as the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale(AIS) C or D

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Stroke a) Patients with severe communication difficulties due to cognitive impairment or aphasia b) Patients with limitation in range of motion of lower limb joints c) Patients at risk of fracture with severe osteoporosis d) Patients with pressure ulcer on the sacrum, coccyx, ischium, etc. e) Patients who had difficulty walking before a stroke 2. SCI a) Patients with limitation in range of motion of lower limb joints b) Patients at risk of fracture with severe osteoporosis c) Patients with pressure ulcer on the sacrum, coccyx, ischium, etc. d) Patients with difficulty in communication due to cognitive impairment e) Patients accompanied by peripheral nerve lesions f) Patients who had difficulty in walking before SCI g) Patients who can walk more than 10m without the help of others or braces(Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury scale (WISCI)-II level 20)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Functional Ambulatory Category;Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Lower Extremity;Berg Balance Scale;10-meter Walk Test;6-minute Walk Test;Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury scale (WISCI)-II	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Rivermead Motility Index;10-meter Walk Test;6-minute Walk Test;Modified Barthel Index;Lower extremity motore score (LEMS) of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI);Proprioception of ISNCSCI at bit toe, ankle and knee;Berg Balance Scale;Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)-II	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactDasom Oh

Inje University Ilsan Paik Hospital

dasom654@naver.com+82-31-839-3727

Outcome results