erector spinae plane block for cervical radiculopathy

Efficacy and safety of the erector spinae plane block versus paravertebral block in the thoracic 2 level for cervical radiculopathy: Prospective randomized controlled study

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0005644

Enrollment

Registered

2020-11-30

Start date

2020-11-23

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2021-01-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : It is intended for patients who visit the Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine at Seoul St. Mary&#39

s Hospital with the address of cervical spinal pain. If cervical disc/stenosis was confirmed by cervical spine MRI and consent to participate in the study in patients complaining of cervical spinal pa

s pain and disability are evaluated in an outpatient clinic, and the value of change is compared with before the procedure. For randomization, using Random allocation software 2.0, set n number to 86

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Upper extremity radiculopathy of NRS more than 4 Cervical HNP/Cervical stenosis confirmed on Cervical MRI

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Shoulder, Hand disease Infection, malignancy Cervical spine operation history CRPS History of nerve block within the last 2 weeks Unstable psychiatric illness Pregnant, lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Numeric rating scale	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Neck disablity index	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public Contactjiyeong kim

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

Outcome results