Skip to content

The contralateral comparison of posttetanic count by acceleromyography and electromyography

The contralateral comparison of posttetanic count by acceleromyography and electromyography

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0005444
Enrollment
36
Registered
2020-10-06
Start date
2020-10-12
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2022-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : When monitoring complete(PTC=0) or deep neuromuscular blockade(PTC =1) , we use AMG and EMG monitors which stimulate the ulnar nerves on contralateral arms to obtain twitch response f

Sponsors

Ewha Womans University Medical Center
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 20-65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-2 who were scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: BMI > 25 kg / m2 over American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 3 known neuromuscular disease patients known renal disease or renal dysfuction patient

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement of Complete block and Deep Block between Acceleromyography and Electromyography calculated by The Cohen's kappa statistic

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Agreement of Complete block and Deep Block between Acceleromyography and Electromyography used by The Bland-Altman analysis

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyunyoung Joo

Ewha Womans University Medical Center

lovehei@naver.com+82-2-2650-5285

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026