A prospective randomized controlled trial to compare wet suction and stylet slow-pull technique in endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy for solid pancreatic mass

Comparison of wet suction and stylet slow-pull technique in endoscopic ultrasound guided fined needle biopsy using 22-G needle for solid pancreatic lesions: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004993

Enrollment

136

Registered

2020-05-07

Start date

2019-12-24

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery, Others(Procedure technique of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration) : We perform four times endoscopic ultrasound guided find needle aspiration in solid pancreatic ma

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Over 20 years old 2. Patients who agree to a clinical trial 3. Pancreatic solid mass 6. Solid mass of more than 1cm

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Pregnancy 2. coagulopathy (Platelet < 50,000/mm3, INR>1.5 sec) 3. Patient who have difficulty with endoscopic ultrasound due to abnormal cardiopulmonary function 4. Mainly pancreatic cystic tumor 5. Unable or refuse to provide informed consent 6. Patients who are unable to access a biopsy under endoscopic ultrasound (intervening vessel, altered anatomy etc.) 7. Less than 20 years old

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Yield of histologic core tissue	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Diagnostic accuracy of first needle pass;Diagnostic accuracy by histology specimens;Diagnostic accuracy by cytologic specimens;Specimen cellularity;Sample bloodiness on cytology	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactHyungKu Chon

Wonkwang University Hospital

Outcome results