Comparion of anchoring endoscopic mucosal resection vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection

Anchoring-endoscopic mucosal resection vs. conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large (10-25 mm) colorectal polyps

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004942

Enrollment

210

Registered

2020-04-20

Start date

2020-04-21

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2024-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : 1. experimental group : anchoring EMR on 10-25mm size colorectal polyp 2. active comparator group : conventional EMR on 10-25mm size colorectal polyp In Anchoring EMR, endoscopist

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: Patients will be included in the study if they fulfill the following criteria: • Age of 19 -85 years able to provide written informed consent • patient with 10-25 mm sized colorectal polyp

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Patients will be excluded in the study if they fulfill the following criteria: • Age of 85 years • inable to provide written informed consent • patient with confirmed malignant polyp, suspected malignant polyp, incomplete resection polyp, subepithelial lesion, pedunculated polyp • inflammatory bowel disease patients, uninterrupted antithrombotic therapy patients, coagulopathy patients

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
complete resection rate on first resection	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
en bloc resection rate;procedure time;complication;R0 resection rate	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactCHANG KYO OH

The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

ckdryekd@gmail.com+82-2-2258-2053

Outcome results