The comparisons of outcomes between static and dynamic fixation for syndesmosis injury combined with ankle fractures

The comparisons of clinical and radiologic outcomes between static and dynamic fixation for syndesmosis injury combined with ankle fractures: Prospective randomized controlled study.

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004753

Enrollment

Registered

2020-02-20

Start date

2018-12-25

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : After ankle fracture surgery, diagnosing the syndesmosis is confirmed by external rotation test using C-arm in the operating room. Syndesmotic fixation wull be performed with sing

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: (1) In patients with ankle fractures, patients with syndesmosis injury proven before or during surgery radiologically (2) Patients who can have CT scan before and after surgery (3) Patients who are expected to be able to follow up for more than 2 years (4) Patients who agreed to the agreement

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: (1) patients with other fractures in the unilateral lower extremities such as pilon, talus and calcaneus (2) patients with a history of unilateral lower limb past fractures and ligament injuries (3) Patients with soft tissue damage, such as open fractures and infections (4) patients with arthritis of grade 2 or higher (5) Patients who have premature bone

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Presence of post-traumatic arthritis (Simple radiographs and CT scan)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Visual analogue scale;Foot and Ankle Outcome Score;American Orthopedic foot and ankle score;Tegner Activity Scales	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSung Hyun Lee

Wonkwang University Hospital

Outcome results