Comparison of Visual Neglect using Virtual Reality or Conventional Therapy

Comparative Efficacy of Neglect Rehabilitation Using Virtual Reality - FOR vs. OKN

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004665

Enrollment

Registered

2020-01-29

Start date

2020-02-03

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2020-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : All experiments are conducted in chair with a backrest and armrest to prevent falls. In a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design, all participants are randomly allocated to conduct

fixed field of view conditions (FOV), non-fixed of view conditions (FOR), and non-fixed view conditions with visual cues (FOR-cue). In FOV condition, participants with their head fixed, press the left

before and after intervention, and four weeks after completion of the intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: -Age > 18 - Diagnosis of stroke patient with unilateral neglect syndrome - Cognitive intact (K-MMSE >25)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Severe balance problems that unable to perform the task. - The movement of the cervical region is impaired due to orthopedic problems, etc. - Cannot be recognized on the computer screen due to poor calibrated vision

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
evaluations using HMD	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Albert test;Line bisection test;Star cancellation test;Catherine Bergego Scale(CBS);Clock drawing test;Apple test;Computerized line bisection test;evaluations using Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB);Trail making test(TMT) A, B;Sitting position test	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactYEAJIN HAM

National Rehabilitation Hospital

Outcome results