Efficacy and safety of coronary angiography using snuffbox approach

Randomized Comparison of Snuffbox approach versus Conventional radial artery approach in diagnostic coronary angiography

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004537

Enrollment

158

Registered

2019-12-11

Start date

2019-03-04

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : The puncture site for coronary angiography would be randomly assigned into two groups of conventional radial artery and snuffbox radial artery according to randomization table prep

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: A. Adults aged of 20 or more than 20 B. All comers who take elective coronary angiography

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: A. emergency coronary angiography B. Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction C. End stage renal disease requiring renal replacement therapy D. Previous coronary bypass surgery E. Hard to describe detailed-feature of pain or discomfort due to mental disorder F. Any cases in which femoral approach will be preferred G. Pregnancy or female of child-bearing age H. Failed to obtain informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Discomfort questionnaire score (scale 0~5)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Lidocain to sheath time;Total procedure time;Procedural success rate;Radiation dose;Contrast dose;Radial artery dissection or rupture;hematoma at puncture site;Radial artery obstruction	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactYongsung Suh

Myongji Hospital

Outcome results