Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in simulated c-spine injuries

A randomized clinical trial comparing effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus McCoy laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in simulated cervical spine injuries

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004535

Enrollment

100

Registered

2019-12-10

Start date

2018-08-23

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : American Society of Anesthesiologists I, II and ? patients requiring nasotracheal intubation for elective surgery were randomly allocated into the McCoy group and the C-MAC video lary

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 20-70 year-old, American Society of Anesthesiologists I, II and ? patients requiring nasotracheal intubation for elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Morbid obesity (body mass index >35), active lung disease, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, anticoagulant therapy, abnormal coagulation profile

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
time taken to endotracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
intubation difficulty score	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactKwon Hui Seo

Hallym University Medical Center

julianakh@hanmail.net+82-31-380-5959

Outcome results