Comparison of McCoy and C-MAC for double-lumen tube intubation

A randomized clinical trial comparing the C-MAC video-laryngoscope and the McCoy laryngoscope for double-lumen endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing one lung ventilation

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004532

Enrollment

Registered

2019-12-10

Start date

2018-04-25

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : American Society of Anesthesiologists I, II and ? patients requiring double lumen endotracheal intubation for elective thoracic surgery are randomly allocated into the McCoy group (gr

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 20-70 year-old, American Society of Anesthesiologists I, II and ? patients requiring double lumen endotracheal intubation for elective thoracic surgery

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: Morbid obesity (body mass index >35), active lung disease, uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, anticoagulant therapy, abnormal coagulation profile

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
time taken to endotracheal intubation	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
intubation difficulty score	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactKwon Hui Seo

Hallym University Medical Center

julianakh@hanmail.net+82-31-380-3940

Outcome results