Comparison of radiological, clinical, functional outcomes between anatomically aligned total knee arthroplasty and conventional total knee arthroplasty

Status

Recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004520

Enrollment

102

Registered

2019-12-09

Start date

2019-11-29

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-12-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Procedure/Surgery : This study is a randomized controlled study in patients undergoing same-day bilateral total knee arthroplasty. A patient undergoing same-day bilateral total knee arthroplasty will

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: - Patients for bilateral total knee arthroplasty - having medicare insurance

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: - Rheumatoid arthritis - Other inflammatory arthritis - Crystal-induced arthritis - Septic arthritis - Neuropsychiatric patients - Previous knee operation history - Neuropsychiatric patients - Patients with preoperative severe limitation of motion (Flexion contracture = 20, range of motion = 90) - Patients with preoperative severe defomity of knee alignment (Varus or valgus angle = 15) - Severe obese patients (BMI = 40)

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
Visual pain scale;radiologic parameter (alignment & component)	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
WOMAC(Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index);Forgotten Joint Score;Patient Satisfaction New Knee Society Score	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactIn Jun Koh

The Catholic University of Korea, St. Paul's Hospital

oskoh74@gmail.com+82-2-2030-4628

Outcome results