None listed
Conditions
Interventions
Sponsors
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria: i. Men or women between the ages of 20-85 ii. Patients with back pain, lower limb pain, neurological intermittent claudication for more than 3 months iii. Spinal stenosis is observed on the sagittal plane and cross-section of the spinal MRI iv. There is no response after taking analgesic for more than 1 month v. In the case of a systemic condition that can withstand surgery by general anesthesia vi. Health status to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria: i. Unclear or suspicious symptoms ii. Previous urgical histroy on treatment level iii. Spondylolisthesis abvoe grade II requires surgery iv. Fracture or dislocation v. Vertebral body is destroyed or structurally damaged vi. Vertebral body or disc infection vii. Vertebral body is damaged by metastatic disease
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The degree of muscle damage (CK) was measured and the difference between the four surgical methods was compared and analyzed. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| The VAS score was assessed at the outpatient visit and evaluated as a successful outcome if the VAS score was reduced by at least 2 points compared with the preoperative level, no adverse event requiring reoperation related to the procedure, no neurological deficit or exacerbation;ODI and SF-36 were measured to observe any improvements in the baseline. In the radiological examinations, disc height narrowing, segmental lordosis, and whole lumbar lordosis were examined. | — |
Countries
Korea, Republic of
Contacts
Yonsei University Health System, Gangnam Severance Hospital