A double-blind randomized comparison in the analgesic efficacy between programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) and continuous epidural infusion (CEI) in patients undergoing cesarean section.

Status

Active, not recruiting

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Interventional

Source

CRIS

Registry ID

KCT0004203

Enrollment

Registered

2019-08-19

Start date

2017-09-15

Completion date

Unknown

Last updated

2019-08-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

Medical Device : The epidural solution were consisted of 0.1&#37

ropivacaine with fentanyl 2 mcg/ml and administered via Accumate 1200® infusion pump (WooYoung medical, Seoul, Korea). Parturients were randomized to receive one of the following regimens for the mai

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

Female

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: healthy (ASA physical status I or II), term (>36 gestation weeks) parturients, who scheduled cesarean section under combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: with contraindications to neuraxial blockade or narcotics, history of drug abuse, severe systemic disease (e.g., eclampsia, severe asthma, cardiac, liver or renal disease), or emergency operation were excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
delivered PCEA boluses	—

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
rescue analgesics;pain visual analog score (VAS);side effects related to epidural analgesic (nausea, vomiting, pruritus, paresthesia, motor disturbance)	—

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactAe-ryoung Lee

Jeju National University Hospital

nanrong95@naver.com+82-64-717-1810

Outcome results