Skip to content

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation vs. Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation with additional right atrial linear ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation vs. Radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation with additional right atrial linear ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Prospective randomized trial (CRAPAF Trial)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
CRIS
Registry ID
KCT0003824
Enrollment
330
Registered
2019-04-19
Start date
2019-04-03
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2026-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

None listed

Interventions

ECG if the patient has any symptom) 4. Anticoagulant therapy followed by 2014 ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines 5. All complications in each group will be evaluated including the re-hospitalization rate, major

Sponsors

Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital
Lead Sponsor

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
All

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria: 1. Patient with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (terminated within 7 days) who is scheduled for ablation procedure and =20 and =80 years of age 2. Left atrium size < 45mm 3. paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that is reccurrence during antiarrhythmic drug treatment or is not able to use an antiarrhythmic drug. 4. Patient who is indicated for anticoagulation therapy (for prevention of cerebral infarction)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria: 1. Patients with persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation 2. Atrial fibrillation associated with severe cardiac malformation or a structural heart disease that is hemodynamically affected 3. Patients with severe renal impairment or CT imaging difficulty using contrast media 4. Patients with a past history of radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation or other cardiac surgery 5. Patients with active internal bleeding 6. Patients with contraindications for anticoagulation therapy(for prevention of cerebral infarction) and antiarrhythmic drugs 7. Patients with valvular atrial fibrillation (mitral stenosis >grade 2, mechanical valve, mitral valvuloplasty) 8. Patients with a severe comorbid disease 9. Expected survival < 1 year 10. Drug addicts or alcoholics 11. Patients who cannot read the consent form (illiterates, foreigners, etc.) 12. Other patients who are judged by the principal or sub-investigator to be ineligible for participation in this clinical study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy evaluation: clinical recurrence rate – Defined as atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia > 30 sec after 3 months within 1 year; based on the 2012 ACC/AHA/HRS guidelines, 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring will be performed at 3 month and every 6 months, and ECG and monitoring with a Holter or an event recorder will be performed at any time if the patient complains of symptoms;Safety evaluation: Procedure-related cardiac complication rate - including open cardiac surgery, cerebral infarction, pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade, hematoma in the inguinal puncture site and vascular complications within 30 days post procedure

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison of procedure time, ablation time, and hospitalization period;Comparison of re-hospitalization rate and number of electrical cardioversion after the procedure;Major cardiovascular event rate – death, myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty, and re-hospitalization for arrhythmia and heart failure

Countries

Korea, Republic of

Contacts

Public ContactSohee Joo

Yonsei University Health System, Severance Hospital

shjoo95@yuhs.ac+82-2-2228-8528

Outcome results

None listed

Source: CRIS (via WHO ICTRP) · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026